Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33828846›Full record

SynthesisJournal of global health2021

The effects of mobile health on emergency care in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review and narrative synthesis.

W Tyler Winders, Stephanie C Garbern, Corey B Bills, Pryanka Relan, Megan L Schultz, Indi Trehan, Sean M Kivlehan, Torben K Becker, Ruth McQuillan

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of global health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Global Emergency Medicine: A Scoping Review of the Literature From 2024.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Global emergency medicine: A scoping review of the literature from 2023.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

W Tyler WindersSchool of Public Health, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Stephanie C GarbernDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.
Corey B BillsDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, Colorado, USA.
Pryanka RelanDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Emory Healthcare Network, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Megan L SchultzDepartment of Pediatrics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.
Indi TrehanDepartments of Pediatrics and Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Sean M KivlehanDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, and Harvard Humanitarian Initiative, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Torben K BeckerDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
Ruth McQuillanUsher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
University of Edinburgh · GBBrigham and Women's Hospital · USBrown University · USEmory Healthcare · USMedical College of Wisconsin · USUniversity of Colorado Denver · USUniversity of Florida · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn resource-constrained settings, mobile health (mHealth) has varied applications. While there is strong evidence for its use in chronic disease management, the applications of mHealth for management of acute illness in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) are not as well described. This review systematically explores current available evidence on the effectiveness of mHealth interventions at improving health outcomes in emergency care settings in LMICs.

methodsA systematic search of the literature was performed in accordance with PRISMA guidelines, utilizing seven electronic databases and manual searches to identify peer-reviewed literature containing each of three search elements: mHealth, emergency care (EC), and LMICs. Articles quality was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) criteria.

resultsAfter removing duplicates, 6498 studies met initial search criteria; 108 were eligible for full text review and 46 met criteria for inclusion. Thirty-six pertained to routine emergency care, and 10 involved complex humanitarian emergencies. Based on the GRADE criteria, 15 studies were rated as "Very Low" quality, 24 as "Low" quality, 6 as "Moderate" quality, and 1 as "High" quality. Eight studied data collection, 9 studied decision support, 15 studied direct patient care, and 14 studied health training. All 46 studies reported positive impacts of mHealth on EC in LMICs.

conclusionsMobile health interventions can be effective in improving provider-focused and patient-centered outcomes in both routine and complex EC settings. Future investigations focusing on patient-centered outcomes are needed to further validate these findings.

Indexed as

Emergency Medical ServicesTelemedicineText MessagingDeveloping CountriesHumansPoverty

Identifiers

PMID33828846
PMCPMC8021077
OpenAlexW3143183590

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.