Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33828740›Full record

ArticleJournal of eye movement research2019

Influence of Artificially Generated Interocular Blur Difference on Fusion Stability Under Vergence Stress.

Miroslav Dostalek, Karel Fliegel, Ladislav Dusek, Tomas Lukes, Jan Hejda, Michaela Duchackova, Jiri Hozman, Rudolf Autrata

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of eye movement research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Miroslav DostalekCenter of Paediatric Ophthalmology BINOCULAR, Litomysl; Czech Republic.
Karel FliegelCzech Technical University in Prague, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Dept. Radioelectronics, Czech Republic.
Ladislav DusekMasaryk University, Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses, Brno, Czech Republic.
Tomas LukesCzech Technical University in Prague, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Dept. Radioelectronics, Czech Republic.
Jan HejdaCzech Technical University in Prague, Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Dept. Biomedical Technology, Czech Republic.
Michaela DuchackovaCenter of Paediatric Ophthalmology BINOCULAR, Litomysl; Czech Republic.
Jiri HozmanCzech Technical University in Prague, Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Dept. Biomedical Technology, Czech Republic.
Rudolf AutrataMasaryk University, Faculty of Medicine, Dept. Pediatric Ophthalmology, Brno, Czech Republic.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The stability of fusion was evaluated by its breakage when interocular blur differences were presented under vergence demand to healthy subjects. We presumed that these blur differences cause suppression of the more blurred image (interocular blur suppression, IOBS), disrupt binocular fusion and suppressed eye leaves its forced vergent position. During dichoptic presentation of static grayscale images of natural scenes, the luminance contrast (mode B) or higher-spatial frequency content (mode C) or luminance contrast plus higher-spatial frequency content (mode A) were stepwise reduced in the image presented to the non-dominant eye. We studied the effect of these types of blur on fusion stability at various levels of the vergence demand. During the divergence demand, the fusion was disrupted with approximately half blur than during convergence. Various modes of blur influenced fusion differently. The mode C (isolated reduction of higher-spatial frequency content) violated fusion under the lowest vergence demand significantly more than either isolated or combined reduction of luminance contrast (mode B and A). According to our results, the image´s details (i.e. higher-spatial frequency content) protects binocular fusion from disruption by the lowest vergence demand.

Indexed as

binocular fusion efficiencybinocular rivalryblur balanceblur conflictnatural image statisticssignal strengthsuppressionvergence demand

Identifiers

PMID33828740
PMCPMC7880136

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.