Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33828613›Full record

ArticleJournal of smoking cessation2021

Does Medication Sampling Improve Compliance with Brief Advice? Results from a Pragmatic Randomized Clinical Trial.

Nathaniel J Silvestri, Jennifer Dahne, Amy E Wahlquist, Benjamin Toll, Matthew J Carpenter

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of smoking cessation, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02096029 (Brief, Novel Smoking Cessation in Primary Care), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 48% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02096029 nacompletednot on this map

Brief, Novel Smoking Cessation in Primary Care: A Comparative Effectiveness Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorMedical University of South CarolinaRan2014 to 2018Enrolled1,278ConditionsSmoking, Smoking CessationArmsNicotine Replacement Therapy (NRT) Sampling, Ask, Advise, Refer (physician brief advice)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Nathaniel J SilvestriCollege of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC), USA.
Jennifer DahneDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, MUSC, USA.
Amy E WahlquistHollings Cancer Center, MUSC, USA.
Benjamin TollDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, MUSC, USA.
Matthew J CarpenterDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, MUSC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8909-1302
Department of Public Health · ASMedical University of South Carolina · USMUSC Hollings Cancer Center · US

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
South Carolina Clinical & Translational Research Institute (SCTR)UL1TR001450 · NCATS · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI BRADY, KATHLEEN T., FLUME, PATRICK A · 2015 to 2024
$41.1M
Brief, Novel Smoking Cessation in Primary Care: A Comparative Effectiveness TrialR01DA021619 · NIDA · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI CARPENTER, MATTHEW J · 2007 to 2017
$4.2M
Development and Testing of a Depression-Specific Behavioral Activation Mobile App Paired with Nicotine Replacement Therapy Sampling for Smoking Cessation Treatment Via Primary CareK23DA045766 · NIDA · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI DAHNE, JENNIFER RENEE · 2018 to 2022
$1.0M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001450NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NIDA NIH HHS K23 DA045766NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA021619
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe 5As model is a standard component of most guidelines for tobacco treatment. Unfortunately, provider adherence to this model is modest.

aimsProviding physicians with adjunctive tools to adhere to 5As guidelines may serve as a catalyst for brief advice delivery.

methodsThis was a secondary data analysis of a cluster randomized clinical trial assessing the uptake and impact of free nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) sampling versus standard care in primary care. Patients reported receipt of separate elements of the 5As model, assessed one month following a baseline visit. Analyses compared patients who recalled receipt of brief advice among those who received NRT vs. standard care. Additional analyses examined demographic predictors of receiving brief advice. RESULTS/

findingsMedication sampling did not improve compliance with ask, advise, or assess. Receipt of "assistance" was significantly higher among NRT recipients (70%) (

conclusionsProvision of NRT sampling increased provider compliance with some elements of the brief advice model, thus enhancing the impact of cessation advice within primary care.

trial registrationThis trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02096029.

Identifiers

PMID33828613
PMCPMC8023690
OpenAlexW3138066559

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.