Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33828593›Full record

ArticleJournal of environmental and public health2021

Occupational Noise Exposure and Diabetes Risk.

Imene Kacem, M Kahloul, M Maoua, M Hafsia, A Brahem, M Limam, M Ghardallou, F Brahem, H Aroui, O El Maalel and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of environmental and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Association between long-term occupational noise exposure and obesity.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Imene KacemUniversité de Sousse, Faculty of Medicine of Sousse, Sousse, Tunisia.ORCID 0000-0003-0677-9484
M KahloulUniversité de Sousse, Faculty of Medicine of Sousse, Sousse, Tunisia.
M MaouaUniversité de Sousse, Faculty of Medicine of Sousse, Sousse, Tunisia.
M HafsiaUniversité de Sousse, Faculty of Medicine of Sousse, Sousse, Tunisia.
A BrahemUniversité de Sousse, Faculty of Medicine of Sousse, Sousse, Tunisia.
M LimamUniversité de Sousse, Faculty of Medicine of Sousse, Sousse, Tunisia.
M GhardallouUniversité de Sousse, Faculty of Medicine of Sousse, Sousse, Tunisia.
F BrahemUniversité de Sousse, Faculty of Medicine of Sousse, Department of Family and Community Medicine, Research Laboratory "LR12ES03", Sousse 4002, Tunisia.
H ArouiUniversité de Sousse, Faculty of Medicine of Sousse, Sousse, Tunisia.
O El MaalelUniversité de Sousse, Faculty of Medicine of Sousse, Sousse, Tunisia.
H KalboussiUniversité de Sousse, Faculty of Medicine of Sousse, Sousse, Tunisia.
S ChattiUniversité de Sousse, Faculty of Medicine of Sousse, Sousse, Tunisia.
W NaijaUniversité de Sousse, Faculty of Medicine of Sousse, Sousse, Tunisia.
N MrizekUniversité de Sousse, Faculty of Medicine of Sousse, Sousse, Tunisia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Noise is one of the most common worldwide environmental pollutants, especially in occupational fields. As a stressor, it affects not only the ear but also the entire body. Its physiological and psychological impacts have been well established in many conditions such as cardiovascular diseases. However, there is a dearth of evidence regarding diabetes risk related to noises. Aim: To evaluate the relationship between occupational exposure to noise and the risk of developing diabetes. Methods: This is a cross-sectional analytical study enrolling two groups of 151 workers each. The first group (noise exposed group: EG) included the employees of a Tunisian power plant, who worked during the day shift and had a permanent position. The second group (unexposed to noise group: NEG) included workers assigned to two academic institutions, who were randomly selected in the Occupational Medicine Department of the Farhat Hached University Hospital in Sousse, during periodical fitness to work visits. Both populations (exposed and unexposed) were matched by age and gender. Data collection was based on a preestablished questionnaire, a physical examination, a biological assessment, and a sonometric study. Results: The mean equivalent continuous sound level was 89 dB for the EG and 44.6 dB for the NEG. Diabetes was diagnosed in 24 workers from EG (15.9%) and 14 workers from NEG (9.3%), with no statistically significant difference ( Conclusion: Our results did not reveal a higher risk of developing diabetes in workers exposed to noise. Further studies assessing both level and duration of noise exposure are needed before any definitive conclusion.

Indexed as

AdultDiabetes MellitusHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedNoise, OccupationalOccupational Exposure

Identifiers

PMID33828593
PMCPMC8004364

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.