ReviewFrontiers in neurology2021
Neurologic Assessment of the Neurocritical Care Patient.
Review in Frontiers in neurology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Predictive Validity of the Full Outline of UnResponsiveness Score Compared to the Glasgow Coma Scale in the Intensive Care Unit: A Systematic Review.Neurocritical care · 2025Pooled it
- Effect Evaluation of Dexmedetomidine Intravenous Anesthesia on Postoperative Agitation in Patients with Craniocerebral Injury by Magnetic Resonance Imaging Based on Sparse Reconstruction Algorithm.Contrast media & molecular imaging · 2022Trial
- Association Between Pain, Agitation, and Intracranial Pressure with Cerebral Near-Infrared Spectroscopy in Critically Ill Children: A Prospective Pilot Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Outcomes and Decision-Making Following Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Within a Multidisciplinary Neuroprognostication Pathway in a Tertiary Cardiac Intensive Care Unit.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Observational
- Prognostic Value of the Day 5-7 Neurological Examination in Anterior Circulation Ischemic Stroke: A Post Hoc Analysis of the MARVEL Trial.Neurology and therapy · 2026Article
- Sedation as an Immunomodulator of Inflammatory Responses in the Lung-Brain Axis of ARDS.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Sedation and analgesia strategies in the neuro intensive care unit.World journal of critical care medicine · 2025Review
- Prevention of Unbearable Situations and Harms Protocol: A Quality Improvement Initiative in Neurological Delirium.Journal of clinical neurology (Seoul, Korea) · 2025Article
- The Design and Application of Wearable Ultrasound Devices for Detection and Imaging.Biosensors · 2025Review
- Isoflurane vs. Propofol Sedation in Patients with Severe Stroke: A Clinical Proof-of-Concept-Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- "NeuroVanguard": a contemporary strategy in neuromonitoring for severe adult brain injury patients.Critical care (London, England) · 2024Review
- Neuromonitoring in Children with Traumatic Brain Injury.Neurocritical care · 2024Review
- Modern Sedation and Analgesia Strategies in Neurocritical Care.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2023Review
- Serum lactate monitoring may help to predict neurological function impairment caused by acute metabolism crisis.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Less-invasive subdural electrocorticography for investigation of spreading depolarizations in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage.Frontiers in neurology · 2022Article
- New-Onset Refractory Status Epilepticus Secondary to COVID-19 Infection in Adults: A Systematic Review.Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2022Review
- Brain-lung interactions and mechanical ventilation in patients with isolated brain injury.Critical care (London, England) · 2021Review
- Oral Care and Positioning to Prevent Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia: A Systematic Review.SAGE open nursingReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sedation is a ubiquitous practice in ICUs and NCCUs. It has the benefit of reducing cerebral energy demands, but also precludes an accurate neurologic assessment. Because of this, sedation is intermittently stopped for the purposes of a neurologic assessment, which is termed a neurologic wake-up test (NWT). NWTs are considered to be the gold-standard in continued assessment of brain-injured patients under sedation. NWTs also produce an acute stress response that is accompanied by elevations in blood pressure, respiratory rate, heart rate, and ICP. Utilization of cerebral microdialysis and brain tissue oxygen monitoring in small cohorts of brain-injured patients suggests that this is not mirrored by alterations in cerebral metabolism, and seldom affects oxygenation. The hard contraindications for the NWT are preexisting intracranial hypertension, barbiturate treatment, status epilepticus, and hyperthermia. However, hemodynamic instability, sedative use for primary ICP control, and sedative use for severe agitation or respiratory distress are considered significant safety concerns. Despite ubiquitous recommendation, it is not clear if additional clinically relevant information is gleaned through its use, especially with the contemporaneous utilization of multimodality monitoring. Various monitoring modalities provide unique and pertinent information about neurologic function, however, their role in improving patient outcomes and guiding treatment plans has not been fully elucidated. There is a paucity of information pertaining to the optimal frequency of NWTs, and if it differs based on type of injury. Only one concrete recommendation was found in the literature, exemplifying the uncertainty surrounding its utility. The most common sedative used and recommended is propofol because of its rapid onset, short duration, and reduction of cerebral energy requirements. Dexmedetomidine may be employed to facilitate serial NWTs, and should always be used in the non-intubated patient or if propofol infusion syndrome (PRIS) develops. Midazolam is not recommended due to tissue accumulation and residual sedation confounding a reliable NWT. Thus, NWTs are well-tolerated in selected patients and remain recommended as the gold-standard for continued neuromonitoring. Predicated upon one expert panel, they should be performed at least one time per day. Propofol or dexmedetomidine are the main sedative choices, both enabling a rapid awakening and consistent NWT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.