Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33828485›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2021

An Open Question: Is the A

Stefania Merighi, Tino Emanuele Poloni, Lucia Pelloni, Silvia Pasquini, Katia Varani, Fabrizio Vincenzi, Pier Andrea Borea, Stefania Gessi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Experimental modeling of Alzheimer's disease: Translational lessons from cross-taxon analyses.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Dual Anta-Inhibitors Targeting Protein Kinase CK1δ and AMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  4. Review
  5. AInternational review of neurobiology · 2023
    Article
  6. Pathophysiological Role and Medicinal Chemistry of AMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. ACurrent medicinal chemistry · 2022
    Review
  10. ACells · 2021
    Review
  11. Adenosine and Inflammation: Here, There and Everywhere.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Stefania MerighiDepartment of Translational Medicine and for Romagna, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
Tino Emanuele PoloniDepartment of Neurology and Neuropathology, Golgi-Cenci Foundation and ASP Golgi-Redaelli, Abbiategrasso, Italy.
Lucia PelloniDepartment of Translational Medicine and for Romagna, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
Silvia PasquiniDepartment of Translational Medicine and for Romagna, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
Katia VaraniDepartment of Translational Medicine and for Romagna, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
Fabrizio VincenziDepartment of Translational Medicine and for Romagna, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
Pier Andrea BoreaUniversity of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
Stefania GessiDepartment of Translational Medicine and for Romagna, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

A2A adenosine receptorAlzheimer’s diseasebiomarkerneuroinflammationtherapeutic target

Identifiers

PMID33828485
PMCPMC8019913

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.