Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33828326›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Smoothness correction for better SOFI imaging.

Siewert Hugelier, Wim Vandenberg, Tomáš Lukeš, Kristin S Grußmayer, Paul H C Eilers, Peter Dedecker, Cyril Ruckebusch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Siewert HugelierLaboratory for Nanobiology, KU Leuven, 3001, Leuven, Belgium. siewert.hugelier@gmail.com.
Wim VandenbergLaboratory for Nanobiology, KU Leuven, 3001, Leuven, Belgium.
Tomáš LukešLaboratory of Nanoscale Biology, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, 1015, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Kristin S GrußmayerLaboratory of Nanoscale Biology, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, 1015, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Paul H C EilersErasmus University Medical Centre, 3015, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Peter DedeckerLaboratory for Nanobiology, KU Leuven, 3001, Leuven, Belgium.
Cyril RuckebuschUniversity of Lille, CNRS, UMR 8516, LASIRE, 59000, Lille, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sub-diffraction or super-resolution fluorescence imaging allows the visualization of the cellular morphology and interactions at the nanoscale. Statistical analysis methods such as super-resolution optical fluctuation imaging (SOFI) obtain an improved spatial resolution by analyzing fluorophore blinking but can be perturbed by the presence of non-stationary processes such as photodestruction or fluctuations in the illumination. In this work, we propose to use Whittaker smoothing to remove these smooth signal trends and retain only the information associated to independent blinking of the emitters, thus enhancing the SOFI signals. We find that our method works well to correct photodestruction, especially when it occurs quickly. The resulting images show a much higher contrast, strongly suppressed background and a more detailed visualization of cellular structures. Our method is parameter-free and computationally efficient, and can be readily applied on both two-dimensional and three-dimensional data.

Identifiers

PMID33828326
PMCPMC8027426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.