ReviewNature2021
The NIH Somatic Cell Genome Editing program.
Review in Nature, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 78 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
78 citing papers in PubMed, 125 citations in OpenAlex.
- Combining modeling approaches for rapid preclinical evaluation of retinal gene therapy.Molecular therapy. Advances · 2026Article
- The Case for Master Protocols for Rare Neurological Diseases.Annals of neurology · 2026Review
- Genome-wide CRISPR screening identifies cellular factors controlling nonviral genome editing efficiency.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Monitoring Fetal Somatic Cell Genome EditingHuman gene therapy · 2026Article
- Swine reporter model for preclinical evaluation and characterization of gene delivery vectors.Molecular therapy. Advances · 2026Article
- Fully Modified SpyCas9 Guide RNAs Enable Robust Genome Editing In Cells and In Vivo.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Monitoring biological effects of somatic cell genome editing.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2026Review
- Rally around the therapeutic hub.Nature biotechnology · 2026Article
- Prenatal Intraportal Delivery of Polymeric Nanoparticles to Fetal Rhesus Monkeys (Human gene therapy · 2026Article
- Measurement and clinical interpretation of CRISPR off-targets.Nature genetics · 2026Review
- Brain-wide Genome Editing via STEP-RNPs for Treatment of Angelman Syndrome.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Lipid nanoparticle-mediated mRNA delivery to CD34Nature biotechnology · 2025Article
- Alveolar Epithelial Cell Dysfunction in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: Mechanistic Insights and Targeted Interventions.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- "Snip, snip, cure"? Philosophical, legal and biomedical perspectives on novel somatic genomic therapies.Medicine, health care, and philosophy · 2025Article
- Epithelial competition determines gene therapy potential to suppress Fanconi Anemia oral cancer risk.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- CRISPR and gene editing for kidney diseases: where are we?Clinical kidney journal · 2025Review
- Epithelial competition determines gene therapy potential to suppress Fanconi Anemia oral cancer risk.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Building Better Medicine: Translational Justice and the Quest for Equity in US Healthcare.The American journal of bioethics : AJOB · 2025Article
- Base editing as a therapeutic strategy for somatic repeat expansion diseases.Nature genetics · 2025Article
- The state-of-the-art of N-of-1 therapies and the IRDiRC N-of-1 development roadmap.Nature reviews. Drug discovery · 2025Review
18 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
76 authors at 20 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
The move from reading to writing the human genome offers new opportunities to improve human health. The United States National Institutes of Health (NIH) Somatic Cell Genome Editing (SCGE) Consortium aims to accelerate the development of safer and more-effective methods to edit the genomes of disease-relevant somatic cells in patients, even in tissues that are difficult to reach. Here we discuss the consortium's plans to develop and benchmark approaches to induce and measure genome modifications, and to define downstream functional consequences of genome editing within human cells. Central to this effort is a rigorous and innovative approach that requires validation of the technology through third-party testing in small and large animals. New genome editors, delivery technologies and methods for tracking edited cells in vivo, as well as newly developed animal models and human biological systems, will be assembled-along with validated datasets-into an SCGE Toolkit, which will be disseminated widely to the biomedical research community. We visualize this toolkit-and the knowledge generated by its applications-as a means to accelerate the clinical development of new therapies for a wide range of conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.