ArticleBritish journal of cancer2021
Urinary oestrogen steroidome as an indicator of the risk of localised prostate cancer progression.
Article in British journal of cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cyanoacetohydrazide as a Novel Derivatization Agent for the Determination of UHPLC-HRMS Steroids in Urine.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- mRNA Levels of Aromatase, 5α-Reductase Isozymes, and Prostate Cancer-Related Genes in Plucked Hair from Young Men with Androgenic Alopecia.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Molecular Diversity and Biochemical Content in Two Invasive Alien Species: Looking for Chemical Similarities and Bioactivities.Marine drugs · 2022Article
- Circulating estradiol and its biologically active metabolites in endometriosis and in relation to pain symptoms.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundProstate cancer (PCa) is the most common cancer in North American men. Beyond the established contribution of androgens to disease progression, growing evidence suggest that oestrogen-related pathways might also be of clinical importance. The aim of this study was to explore the association of urinary oestrogen levels with clinical outcomes.
methodsUrine samples from the prospective multi-institutional PROCURE cohort were collected before RP for discovery (n = 259) and validation (n = 253). Urinary total oestrogens (unconjugated + conjugated), including oestrone and oestradiol, their bioactive and inactive catechol and methyl derivatives (n = 15), were measured using mass spectrometry (MS).
resultsThe median follow-up time for the discovery and replication cohorts was 7.6 and 6.5 years, respectively. Highly significant correlations between urinary oestrogens were observed; however, correlations with circulating oestrogens were modest. Our findings indicate that higher levels of urinary oestriol and 16-ketoestradiol were associated with lower risk of BCR. In contrast, higher levels of 2-methoxyestrone were associated with an increased risk of development of metastasis/deaths.
conclusionsOur data suggest that urinary levels of oestriol and 16-ketoestradiol metabolites are associated with a more favourable outcome, whereas those of 2-methoxyestrone are associated with an elevated risk of metastasis after RP. Further studies are required to better understand the impact of oestrogens on disease biology and as easily accessible urine-based risk-stratification markers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.