Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33828245›Full record

ReviewSpinal cord2021

A perspective on adverse health outcomes after breast cancer treatment in women with spinal cord injury.

Bonita Sawatzky, Celine M Edwards, Annemarie T Walters-Shumka, Shira Standfield, Tamara Shenkier, Susan R Harris

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Spinal cord, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Bonita SawatzkyDepartment of Orthopaedics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada. bonita.sawatzky@ubc.ca.
Celine M Edwards *Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Annemarie T Walters-Shumka *Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9322-5636
Shira StandfieldSchool of Architecture and Landscape Architecture, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Tamara ShenkierDepartment of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Susan R HarrisDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
University of British Columbia · CAUniversity of British Columbia Hospital · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aging women face increased risks of both breast cancer and spinal cord injury (SCI). Unique treatment challenges for this population warrant consideration. Despite advances in breast cancer treatments, significant adverse health outcomes continue to occur. Cancer treatments can be detrimental to the quality of life of able-bodied women, but more so for women living with pre-existing SCI. The goal of this Perspective Paper is to inform rehabilitation professionals about the needs of women with SCI treated for breast cancer. Specific objectives were: (1) give an overview of breast cancer treatment-related adverse outcomes that need special attention in women with SCI; and (2) inspire researchers to study the consequences of breast cancer-related health conditions in women with SCI. We identified SCI-specific considerations for undergoing breast cancer surgery, chemotherapy, radiation and endocrine therapy. This paper attempts to raise awareness regarding these issues due to the lack of research attention they have received.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsSpinal Cord InjuriesFemaleHumansOutcome Assessment, Health CareQuality of Life

Identifiers

PMID33828245
OpenAlexW3140391746

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.