Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33828118›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Crowdsourced privacy-preserved feature tagging of short home videos for machine learning ASD detection.

Peter Washington, Qandeel Tariq, Emilie Leblanc, Brianna Chrisman, Kaitlyn Dunlap, Aaron Kline, Haik Kalantarian, Yordan Penev, Kelley Paskov, Catalin Voss and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Challenges in the Differential Classification of Individual Diagnoses from Co-Occurring Autism and ADHD Using Survey Data.... IEEE-EMBS International Conference on Biomedical and Health Informatics. IEEE-EMBS International Conference on Biomedical and Health Informatics · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Session Introduction: TOWARDS ETHICAL BIOMEDICAL INFORMATICS: LEARNING FROM OLELO NOEAU, HAWAIIAN PROVERBS.Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing · 2023
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Peter WashingtonDepartment of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Qandeel TariqResearch Scientist, Amazon, Seattle, WA, USA.
Emilie LeblancDepartment of Pediatrics (Systems Medicine), Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Brianna ChrismanDepartment of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Kaitlyn DunlapDepartment of Pediatrics (Systems Medicine), Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Aaron KlineDepartment of Pediatrics (Systems Medicine), Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Haik KalantarianDepartment of Pediatrics (Systems Medicine), Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Yordan PenevDepartment of Pediatrics (Systems Medicine), Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Kelley PaskovDepartment of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Catalin VossDepartment of Computer Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Nathaniel StockhamDepartment of Neuroscience, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Maya VarmaDepartment of Computer Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Arman HusicDepartment of Pediatrics (Systems Medicine), Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Jack KentDepartment of Pediatrics (Systems Medicine), Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Nick HaberGraduate School of Education, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Terry WinogradDepartment of Computer Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Dennis P WallDepartment of Pediatrics (Systems Medicine), Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA. dpwall@stanford.edu.

Funding

POSTDOCTORAL TRAINING IN MEDICAL INFORMATION SCIENCEST15LM007033 · NLM · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI SYLVIA KATINA PLEVRITIS · 1985 to 2026
$25.5M
A Mobile Game for Domain Adaptation and Deep Learning in Autism HealthcareR01LM013364 · NLM · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI WALL, DENNIS PAUL · 2021 to 2025
$3.2M
Creating an artificial intelligence therapy-to-data feedback loop for child developmental healthcareR01LM013083 · NLM · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI WALL, DENNIS PAUL · 2019 to 2022
$2.6M
Biomedical Data Science Graduate Training at StanfordT32LM012409 · NLM · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI PLEVRITIS, SYLVIA KATINA · 2016 to 2020
$1.5M
Evaluation of machine learning to mobilize detection and therapy of developmental delay in childrenR21HD091500 · NICHD · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI WALL, DENNIS PAUL · 2017 to 2018
$432k
NICHD NIH HHS R21 HD091500NLM NIH HHS R01 LM013083NLM NIH HHS R01 LM013364NLM NIH HHS T15 LM007033NLM NIH HHS T32 LM012409
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Standard medical diagnosis of mental health conditions requires licensed experts who are increasingly outnumbered by those at risk, limiting reach. We test the hypothesis that a trustworthy crowd of non-experts can efficiently annotate behavioral features needed for accurate machine learning detection of the common childhood developmental disorder Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) for children under 8 years old. We implement a novel process for identifying and certifying a trustworthy distributed workforce for video feature extraction, selecting a workforce of 102 workers from a pool of 1,107. Two previously validated ASD logistic regression classifiers, evaluated against parent-reported diagnoses, were used to assess the accuracy of the trusted crowd's ratings of unstructured home videos. A representative balanced sample (N = 50 videos) of videos were evaluated with and without face box and pitch shift privacy alterations, with AUROC and AUPRC scores > 0.98. With both privacy-preserving modifications, sensitivity is preserved (96.0%) while maintaining specificity (80.0%) and accuracy (88.0%) at levels comparable to prior classification methods without alterations. We find that machine learning classification from features extracted by a certified nonexpert crowd achieves high performance for ASD detection from natural home videos of the child at risk and maintains high sensitivity when privacy-preserving mechanisms are applied. These results suggest that privacy-safeguarded crowdsourced analysis of short home videos can help enable rapid and mobile machine-learning detection of developmental delays in children.

Indexed as

AdultAlgorithmsAutism Spectrum DisorderBehavior Observation TechniquesChildChild, PreschoolCrowdsourcingData AccuracyFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMachine LearningMaleMental DisordersMiddle AgedSensitivity and Specificity

Identifiers

PMID33828118
PMCPMC8027393

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.