Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33828117›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Evaluation of practical experiences of German speaking radiation oncologists in combining radiation therapy with checkpoint blockade.

Kim M Kraus, Julius C Fischer, Kai J Borm, Marco M E Vogel, Steffi U Pigorsch, Michal Devečka, Stephanie E Combs

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Kim M KrausDepartment of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany. kimmelanie.kraus@mri.tum.de.
Julius C FischerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany.
Kai J BormDepartment of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany.
Marco M E VogelDepartment of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany.
Steffi U PigorschDepartment of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany.
Michal DevečkaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany.
Stephanie E CombsDepartment of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany.
Klinikum rechts der Isar · DETechnical University of Munich · DEGerman Marine Research Consortium · DEHelmholtz Zentrum München · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The results of this survey reveal current clinical practice in the handling of combined radioimmunotherapy with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (RT + ICI). We aim to provide a basis to open a discussion for clinical application of RT + ICI by analyzation of experts' assessment. We conducted a survey with 24 items with a focus on side effects of RT + ICI, common practice of scheduling and handling of adverse events. After pilot testing by radiation oncology experts the link to the online survey was sent to all members of the German Society of Radiation Oncology (DEGRO). In total, 51 radiation oncologists completed the questionnaire. Pulmonary toxicity under RT + ICI with ICIs was reported most frequently. Consensus was observed for bone and soft tissue RT of the limbs in favor for no interruption of ICIs. For cranial RT half of the participants do not suspend ICIs during normofractionated radiotherapy (nfRT) or stereotactic hypofractionated RT (SRT). More participants pause ICIs for central than for peripheral thoracic region. Maintenance therapy with ICIs is mostly not interrupted prior to RT. For management of RT associated pneumonitis under durvalumab the majority of 86.3% suggest corticosteroid therapy and 76.5% would postpone the next cycle of ICI therapy. The here obtained assessment and experiences by radiation oncologists reveal a large variability in practical handling of combined RT + ICI. Until scientific evidence is available a discussion for current clinical application of RT + ICI should be triggered. Interdisciplinary consensus guidelines with practical recommendations are required.

Indexed as

AdultAttitude of Health PersonnelCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungClinical CompetenceFemaleGermanyHealth PersonnelHumansImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedRadiation OncologistsRadioimmunotherapyRetrospective StudiesSurveys and QuestionnairesImmune Checkpoint Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID33828117
PMCPMC8027172
OpenAlexW3148349215

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.