Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33827982›Full record

Observational studyCancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology2021

Urinary Cotinine and Cotinine + Trans-3'-Hydroxycotinine (TNE-2) Cut-points for Distinguishing Tobacco Use from Nonuse in the United States: PATH Study (2013-2014).

Kathryn C Edwards, Tasmia Naz, Cassandra A Stanton, Maciej L Goniewicz, Dorothy K Hatsukami, Danielle M Smith, Lanqing Wang, Andrea Villanti, Jennifer Pearson, Benjamin C Blount and 13 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Tobacco Biomarkers by Latino Heritage and Race, US, 2007 to 2014 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2024
    Article
  3. Urinary anatalline and nicotelline cut-points to distinguish between exclusive and dual use of tobacco products.Biomarkers : biochemical indicators of exposure, response, and susceptibility to chemicals · 2024
    Article
  4. Validating Wave 1 (2014) Urinary Cotinine and TNE-2 Cut-points for Differentiating Wave 4 (2017) Cigarette Use from Non-use in the United States Using Data from the PATH Study.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Optimal Cutoff Concentration of Urinary Cyanoethyl Mercapturic Acid for Differentiating Cigarette Smokers From Nonsmokers.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 10 institutions in 3 countries.

Kathryn C EdwardsWestat, Rockville, Maryland. KatyEdwards@westat.com.
Tasmia NazWestat, Rockville, Maryland.
Cassandra A StantonWestat, Rockville, Maryland.
Maciej L GoniewiczRoswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York.ORCID 0000-0001-6748-3068
Dorothy K HatsukamiUniversity of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.ORCID 0000-0002-1108-2609
Danielle M SmithRoswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York.
Lanqing WangCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Andrea VillantiUniversity of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont.
Jennifer PearsonUniversity of Nevada-Reno, Reno, Nevada.ORCID 0000-0002-1400-5932
Benjamin C BlountCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.ORCID 0000-0003-4788-8169
Maansi Bansal-TraversRoswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York.
June FengCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Raymond NiauraNew York University, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0002-0856-3540
Michelle T Bover ManderskiRutgers Center for Tobacco Studies, Rutgers Biomedical and Health Sciences, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey.ORCID 0000-0003-0000-221X
Connie S SosnoffCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.ORCID 0000-0001-9162-633X
Cristine D DelnevoRutgers Center for Tobacco Studies, Rutgers Biomedical and Health Sciences, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey.
Kara DuffyCenter for Tobacco Products, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland.
Arseima Y Del Valle-PineroCenter for Tobacco Products, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland.
Brian L RostronCenter for Tobacco Products, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland.
Colm EverardKelly Government Solutions, Rockville, Maryland.
Heather L KimmelDivision of Epidemiology, Services, and Prevention Research, National Institute on Drug Abuse, Bethesda, Maryland.ORCID 0000-0001-8278-0095
Dana M van BemmelCenter for Tobacco Products, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland.
Andrew HylandWestat, Rockville, Maryland.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · USRoswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center · USUnited States Food and Drug Administration · USWestat (United States) · USNational Institute on Drug Abuse · USRutgers, The State University of New Jersey · USUniversity of Minnesota · USUniversity of Nevada, Reno · USUniversity of Vermont · USYork University · CA

Funding

NIDA NIH HHS HHSN271201100027CNIDA NIH HHS HHSN271201600001C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDetermine the overall, sex-, and racially/ethnically-appropriate population-level cotinine and total nicotine equivalents (TNE-2, the molar sum of the two major nicotine metabolites) cut-points to distinguish tobacco users from nonusers across multiple definitions of use (e.g., exclusive vs. polytobacco, and daily vs. non-daily).

methodsUsing Wave 1 (2013-2014) of the U.S. Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study, we conducted weighted Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis to determine the optimal urinary cotinine and TNE-2 cut-points, stratified by sex and race/ethnicity.

resultsFor past 30-day exclusive cigarette users, the cotinine cut-point that distinguished them from nonusers was 40.5 ng/mL, with considerable variation by sex (male: 22.2 ng/mL; female: 43.1 ng/mL) and between racial/ethnic groups (non-Hispanic other: 5.2 ng/mL; non-Hispanic black: 297.0 ng/mL). A similar, but attenuated, pattern emerged when assessing polytobacco cigarette users (overall cut-point = 39.1 ng/mL, range = 5.5 ng/mL-80.4 ng/mL) and any tobacco users (overall cut-point = 39.1 ng/mL, range = 4.8 ng/mL-40.0 ng/mL). Using TNE-2, which is less impacted by racial differences in nicotine metabolism, produced a comparable pattern of results although reduced the range magnitude.

conclusionsBecause of similar frequency of cigarette use among polytobacco users, overall cut-points for exclusive cigarette use were not substantially different from cut-points that included polytobacco cigarette use or any tobacco use. Results revealed important differences in sex and race/ethnicity appropriate cut-points when evaluating tobacco use status and established novel urinary TNE-2 cut-points. IMPACT: These cut-points may be used for biochemical verification of self-reported tobacco use in epidemiologic studies and clinical trials.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultBiomarkersCotinineFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedPrevalenceReference ValuesROC CurveSelf ReportTobacco UseUnited StatesYoung AdultBiomarkersCotininehydroxycotinine

Identifiers

PMID33827982
PMCPMC10337127
OpenAlexW3152114988

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.