Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33827939›Full record

ArticleJournal of virology2021

Broadly Protective CD8

Han Zhang, Huaguo Zheng, Peng Guo, Liuyi Hu, Zihao Wang, Jiuru Wang, Ying Ju, Songdong Meng

Erratum issuedOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of virology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Assessing CD8Clinical & translational immunology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Han ZhangKey Laboratory of Pathogenic Microbiology and Immunology, Center for Biosafety Mega-Science, Chinese Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Huaguo ZhengKey Laboratory of Pathogenic Microbiology and Immunology, Center for Biosafety Mega-Science, Chinese Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Peng GuoKey Laboratory of Pathogenic Microbiology and Immunology, Center for Biosafety Mega-Science, Chinese Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Liuyi HuKey Laboratory of Pathogenic Microbiology and Immunology, Center for Biosafety Mega-Science, Chinese Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Zihao WangKey Laboratory of Pathogenic Microbiology and Immunology, Center for Biosafety Mega-Science, Chinese Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Jiuru WangKey Laboratory of Pathogenic Microbiology and Immunology, Center for Biosafety Mega-Science, Chinese Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Ying JuKey Laboratory of Pathogenic Microbiology and Immunology, Center for Biosafety Mega-Science, Chinese Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Songdong MengKey Laboratory of Pathogenic Microbiology and Immunology, Center for Biosafety Mega-Science, Chinese Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China mengsd@im.ac.cn.
Institute of Microbiology · CNChinese Academy of Sciences · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Currently, immunization with inactivated influenza virus vaccines is the most prevalent method to prevent infections. However, licensed influenza vaccines provide only strain-specific protection and need to be updated and administered yearly; thus, new vaccines that provide broad protection against multiple influenza virus subtypes are required. In this study, we demonstrated that intradermal immunization with gp96-adjuvanted seasonal influenza monovalent H1N1 split vaccine could induce cross-protection against both group 1 and group 2 influenza A viruses in BALB/c mouse models. Vaccination in the presence of gp96 induced an apparently stronger antigen-specific T cell response than split vaccine alone. Immunization with the gp96-adjuvanted vaccine also elicited an apparent cross-reactive CD8

Indexed as

Adjuvants, ImmunologicAnimalsAntibodies, ViralCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesCross ProtectionCross ReactionsEpitopesEpitopes, T-LymphocyteHemagglutination Inhibition TestsHemagglutinin Glycoproteins, Influenza VirusImmunity, HeterologousImmunoglobulin GInfluenza A Virus, H1N1 SubtypeInfluenza A Virus, H3N2 SubtypeInfluenza VaccinesMembrane GlycoproteinsAdjuvants, ImmunologicAntibodies, ViralendoplasminEpitopesEpitopes, T-LymphocyteHemagglutinin Glycoproteins, Influenza VirusImmunoglobulin GInfluenza Vaccinesinfluenza virus polymerase basic protein 1M1 protein, Influenza A virusMembrane GlycoproteinsNeuraminidaseNP protein, Influenza A virusNucleocapsid ProteinsViral Matrix ProteinsViral ProteinsCD8+ T cellsconserved epitopescross-protectiongp96influenza vaccine

Identifiers

PMID33827939
PMCPMC8315956
OpenAlexW3143501551

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.