Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33827904›Full record

ReviewJournal for immunotherapy of cancer2021

Radiation dose and fraction in immunotherapy: one-size regimen does not fit all settings, so how does one choose?

Sandra Demaria, Chandan Guha, Jonathan Schoenfeld, Zachary Morris, Arta Monjazeb, Andrew Sikora, Marka Crittenden, Stephen Shiao, Samir Khleif, Seema Gupta and 4 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal for immunotherapy of cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06595108 (Atezolizumab and Bevacizumab With Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma), which is not on this map. Cited by 182 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
182citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
16.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06595108 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Atezolizumab and Bevacizumab With Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma

TypeinterventionalSponsorYonsei UniversityRan2024 to 2028Enrolled33ConditionsAdvanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma, Chemotherapy, Stereotactic Body RadiotherapyArmsStereotactic body radiotherapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

182 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 277 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

122 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 10 institutions in 4 countries.

Sandra DemariaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4426-0499
Chandan GuhaRadiation Oncology, Pathology and Urology, and Institute of Onco-Physics, Montefiore Hospital and Medical Center, Bronx, New York, USA.
Jonathan SchoenfeldDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Zachary MorrisHuman Oncology, University of Wisconsin Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Arta MonjazebRadiation Oncology, UC Davis, Davis, California, USA.
Andrew SikoraHead and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Marka CrittendenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Providence Portland Medical Center, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Stephen ShiaoRadiation Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Samir KhleifThe Loop Immuno-Oncology Laboratory, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
Seema GuptaThe Loop Immuno-Oncology Laboratory, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0106-595X
Silvia Chiara FormentiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA.
Bhadrasain VikramRadiation Research Program, National Cancer Institute Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
C Norman ColemanRadiation Research Program, National Cancer Institute Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Mansoor M AhmedRadiation Research Program, National Cancer Institute Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, Bethesda, Maryland, USA ahmedmm@mail.nih.gov.ORCID 0000-0002-4634-9430
National Cancer Institute · MYCornell University · USGeorgetown University · USCedars-Sinai Medical Center · USDana-Farber Cancer Institute · USMontefiore Medical Center · USProvidence Portland Medical Center · USRadiation Oncology Associates · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

Radiation-induced molecular targetsZIABC010670 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI COLEMAN, NORMAN · 2009 to 2024
$17.3M
Impact of the Microbiome on the Efficacy of Radiation TherapyR01CA220000 · NCI · CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER · PI SHIAO, STEPHEN L. · 2017 to 2021
$1.7M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA220000
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent evidence indicates that ionizing radiation can enhance immune responses to tumors. Advances in radiation delivery techniques allow hypofractionated delivery of conformal radiotherapy. Hypofractionation or other modifications of standard fractionation may improve radiation's ability to promote immune responses to tumors. Other novel delivery options may also affect immune responses, including T-cell activation and tumor-antigen presentation changes. However, there is limited understanding of the immunological impact of hypofractionated and unique multifractionated radiotherapy regimens, as these observations are relatively recent. Hence, these differences in radiotherapy fractionation result in distinct immune-modulatory effects. Radiation oncologists and immunologists convened a virtual consensus discussion to identify current deficiencies, challenges, pitfalls and critical gaps when combining radiotherapy with immunotherapy and making recommendations to the field and advise National Cancer Institute on new directions and initiatives that will help further development of these two fields.This commentary aims to raise the awareness of this complexity so that the need to study radiation dose, fractionation, type and volume is understood and valued by the immuno-oncology research community. Divergence of approaches and findings between preclinical studies and clinical trials highlights the need for evaluating the design of future clinical studies with particular emphasis on radiation dose and fractionation, immune biomarkers and selecting appropriate end points for combination radiation/immune modulator trials, recognizing that direct effect on the tumor and potential abscopal effect may well be different. Similarly, preclinical studies should be designed as much as possible to model the intended clinical setting. This article describes a conceptual framework for testing different radiation therapy regimens as separate models of how radiation itself functions as an immunomodulatory 'drug' to provide alternatives to the widely adopted 'one-size-fits-all' strategy of frequently used 8 Gy×3 regimens immunomodulation.

Indexed as

Clinical Decision-MakingImmunotherapyRadiation DosageAnimalsCombined Modality TherapyDose Fractionation, RadiationHumansNeoplasmsPatient SafetyRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsTreatment OutcomeTumor Microenvironmentclinical trials as topicimmunotherapyradiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID33827904
PMCPMC8031689
OpenAlexW3148592396

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.