Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33827844›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

Emerging responses implemented to prevent and respond to violence against women and children in WHO European member states during the COVID-19 pandemic: a scoping review of online media reports.

Isabelle Pearson, Nadia Butler, Zhamin Yelgezekova, Åsa Nihlén, Isabel Yordi Aguirre, Zara Quigg, Heidi Stöckl

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. "International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Isabelle PearsonGlobal Health and Development, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK isabelle.pearson@lshtm.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-8857-5703
Nadia ButlerPublic Health Institute, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK.
Zhamin YelgezekovaWorld Health Organization Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Åsa NihlénWorld Health Organization Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Isabel Yordi AguirreWorld Health Organization Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Zara QuiggPublic Health Institute, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK.
Heidi StöcklGlobal Health and Development, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0907-8483
World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe · DKLiverpool John Moores University · GBLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GB

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study aims to explore the strategies that governments and civil society organisations implemented to prevent and respond to the anticipated rise in violence against women and/or children (VAWC) during the 2019 novel coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic.

designA scoping review and content analysis of online media reports.

settingWHO European region.

methodsA scoping review of media reports and publications and a search of other grey literature (published from 1 January to 17 September 2020). Primary and secondary outcome measures included measures implemented by governments, public services and non-governmental and civil organisations to prevent or respond to VAWC during the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic.

resultsOur study found that in 52 of the 53 member states there was at least one measure undertaken to prevent or respond to VAWC during the pandemic. Government-led or government-sponsored measures were the most common, reported in 50 member states. Non-governmental and other civil society-led prevention and response measures were reported in 40 member states. The most common measure was the use of media and social media to raise awareness of VAWC and to provide VAWC services through online platforms, followed by measures taken to expand and/or maintain helpline services for those exposed to violence.

conclusionThe potential increase in VAWC during COVID-19-imposed restrictions and lockdowns resulted in adaptations and/or increases in prevention and response strategies in nearly all member states. The strength of existing public health systems influenced the requirement and choice of strategies and highlights the need for sustaining and improving violence prevention and response services. Innovative strategies employed in several member states may offer opportunities for countries to strengthen prevention and responses in the near future and during similar emergencies.

Indexed as

COVID-19Mass MediaPandemicsChildCommunicable Disease ControlDomestic ViolenceEuropeFemaleHumansInternetWorld Health Organizationchild protectionCOVID-19public health

Identifiers

PMID33827844
PMCPMC8029039
OpenAlexW3146728712

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.