Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33827827›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

From hospitalisation to primary care: integrative model of clinical pharmacy with patients implanted with a PICC line-research protocol for a prospective before-after study.

Alix Marie Pouget, Elodie Civade, Philippe Cestac, Charlotte Rouzaud-Laborde

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04359056 (Integration of Clinical Pharmacy Along the Entire Care Pathway of Patients Implanted with a PICC-line), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04359056 nacompletednot on this map

Integration of Clinical Pharmacy Along the Entire Care Pathway of Patients Implanted with a PICC-line

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital, ToulouseRan2020 to 2021Enrolled138ConditionsCatheter ComplicationsArmsClinical pharmacy activities along the care pathways
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alix Marie PougetDepartment of Pharmacy, University Hospital Centre Toulouse, Toulouse, Occitanie, France pouget.am@chu-toulouse.fr.ORCID 0000-0002-2379-454X
Elodie CivadeDepartment of Pharmacy, University Hospital Centre Toulouse, Toulouse, Occitanie, France.
Philippe CestacDepartment of Pharmacy, University Hospital Centre Toulouse, Toulouse, Occitanie, France.
Charlotte Rouzaud-LabordeDepartment of Pharmacy, University Hospital Centre Toulouse, Toulouse, Occitanie, France.
Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionClinical pharmacy improves patient safety and secures drug management using information, education and good clinical practices. However, medical device management is still unexplored, and proof of effectiveness is needed. A PICC line (peripherally inserted central catheter) is a medical device for infusion. It accesses the central venous system after being implanted in a peripheral vein. However, complications after implantation often interfere with smooth execution of the treatment. We hypothesise that clinical pharmacy for medical devices could be as effective as clinical pharmacy for medications. The main objective is to assess the effectiveness of clinical pharmacy activities on the complication rate after PICC line implantation. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a before-after prospective study. The study will begin with an observational period without clinical pharmacy activities, followed by an interventional period where pharmacists will intervene on drug and medical device management and provide personalised follow-up and advice. Sixty-nine adult patients will be recruited in each 6-month period from all traditional care units. The main inclusion criteria will be the implantation of a PICC line. The primary outcome is the decrease in the number of complications per patient and per month. Secondary outcomes are the consultation and hospital readmission rates, the acceptance rate of pharmaceutical interventions, the patients' quality of life, the direct hospital induced or avoided costs and the participants' satisfaction. Data will be collected using case report forms during hospitalisation and telephone follow-up after discharge. The analysis will compare these criteria during the two periods. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has received the approval of our Ethics Committee (Clermont-Ferrand Southeast VI, France, number AU1586). Results will be made available to the patients or their caregivers, the sponsor and other researchers when asked, as described in the consent form. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04359056.

Indexed as

Catheterization, PeripheralPharmacyAdultControlled Before-After StudiesFranceHospitalizationHumansPrimary Health CareProspective StudiesQuality of Lifeclinical pharmacologyclinical trialsprimary careprotocols & guidelines

Identifiers

PMID33827827
PMCPMC8031034
OpenAlexW3140653660

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.