Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33827795›Full record

ReviewBMJ global health2021

Deservingness: migration and health in social context.

Seth M Holmes, Ernesto Castañeda, Jeremy Geeraert, Heide Castaneda, Ursula Probst, Nina Zeldes, Sarah S Willen, Yusupha Dibba, Raphael Frankfurter, Anne Kveim Lie and 3 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMJ global health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Alcohol-related liver disease and access to liver transplantation: where we stand and where we should go.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Seth M HolmesSociety and Environment, Medical Anthropology, and Public Health, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, California, USA sethmholmes@berkeley.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-2244-2868
Ernesto CastañedaSociology, American University, Washington, DC, USA.
Jeremy GeeraertEuropean Ethnology, Humboldt University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Heide CastanedaAnthropology, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA.
Ursula ProbstInstitute for Social and Cultural Anthropology, Free University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6445-1949
Nina ZeldesInstitute for Social and Cultural Anthropology, Free University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Sarah S WillenAnthropology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0827-0510
Yusupha DibbaPartners in Health, Freetown, Sierra Leone.
Raphael FrankfurterSchool of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Anne Kveim LieInstitute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
John Fredrik AskjerInstitute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Heidi FjeldInstitute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-0182-9155
Migration and Health in Social Context Working Group

Funding

MEDICAL SCIENTIST TRAINING PROGRAMT32GM007618 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI ANDERSON, MARK S · 1985 to 2020
$29.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007618
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article brings the social science concept of 'deservingness' to bear on clinical cases of transnational migrant patients. Based on the authors' medical social science research, health delivery practice and clinical work from multiple locations in Africa. Europe and the Americas, the article describes three clinical cases in which assumptions of deservingness have significant implications for the morbidity and mortality of migrant patients. The concept of deservingness allows us to maintain a critical awareness of the often unspoken presumptions of which categories of patients are more or less deserving of access to and quality of care, regardless of their formal legal eligibility. Many transnational migrants with ambiguous legal status who rely on public healthcare experience exclusion from care or poor treatment based on notions of deservingness held by health clinic staff, clinicians and health system planners. The article proposes several implications for clinicians, health professional education, policymaking and advocacy. A critical lens on deservingness can help global health professionals, systems and policymakers confront and change entrenched patterns of unequal access to and differential quality of care for migrant patients. In this way, health professionals can work more effectively for global health equity.

Indexed as

Transients and MigrantsAfricaEuropeGlobal HealthHumansSocial Environmenthealth policies and all other topicshealth systemspublic healthqualitative studytreatment

Identifiers

PMID33827795
PMCPMC8031028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.