Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33827705›Full record

ArticleImplementation science communications2021

Adaptation of a quality improvement approach to implement eScreening in VHA healthcare settings: innovative use of the Lean Six Sigma Rapid Process Improvement Workshop.

James O E Pittman, Borsika Rabin, Erin Almklov, Niloofar Afari, Elizabeth Floto, Eusebio Rodriguez, Laurie Lindamer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Implementation science communications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

James O E PittmanVA Center of Excellence for Stress and Mental Health, 3350 La Jolla Village Dr., San Diego, CA, USA. james.pittman@va.gov.
Borsika RabinVA Center of Excellence for Stress and Mental Health, 3350 La Jolla Village Dr., San Diego, CA, USA.
Erin AlmklovVA Center of Excellence for Stress and Mental Health, 3350 La Jolla Village Dr., San Diego, CA, USA.
Niloofar AfariVA Center of Excellence for Stress and Mental Health, 3350 La Jolla Village Dr., San Diego, CA, USA.
Elizabeth FlotoVA Roseburg Health Care System, 913 NW Garden Valley Blvd, Roseburg, OR, USA.
Eusebio RodriguezVA San Diego Healthcare System, 3350 La Jolla Village Dr., San Diego, CA, USA.
Laurie LindamerVA Center of Excellence for Stress and Mental Health, 3350 La Jolla Village Dr., San Diego, CA, USA.
VA San Diego Healthcare System · USUniversity of California, San Diego · USVA Roseburg Healthcare System · US

Funding

National VA Care Management and Social Work Program Office, VHA Diffusion Council, and the VA Center of Excellence for Stress and Mental Health (CESAMH). NA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Veterans Health Administration (VHA) developed a comprehensive mobile screening technology (eScreening) that provides customized and automated self-report health screening via mobile tablet for veterans seen in VHA settings. There is agreement about the value of health technology, but limited knowledge of how best to broadly implement and scale up health technologies. Quality improvement (QI) methods may offer solutions to overcome barriers related to broad scale implementation of technology in health systems. We aimed to develop a process guide for eScreening implementation in VHA clinics to automate self-report screening of mental health symptoms and psychosocial challenges.

methodsThis was a two-phase, mixed methods implementation project building on an adapted quality improvement method. In phase one, we adapted and conducted an RPIW to develop a generalizable process guide for eScreening implementation (eScreening Playbook). In phase two, we integrated the eScreening Playbook and RPIW with additional strategies of training and facilitation to create a multicomponent implementation strategy (MCIS) for eScreening. We then piloted the MCIS in two VHA sites. Quantitative eScreening pre-implementation survey data and qualitative implementation process "mini interviews" were collected from individuals at each of the two sites who participated in the implementation process. Survey data were characterized using descriptive statistics, and interview data were independently coded using a rapid qualitative analytic approach.

resultsPilot data showed overall satisfaction and usefulness of our MCIS approach and identified some challenges, solutions, and potential adaptations across sites. Both sites used the components of the MCIS, but site 2 elected not to include the RPIW. Survey data revealed positive responses related to eScreening from staff at both sites. Interview data exposed implementation challenges related to the technology, support, and education at both sites. Workflow and staffing resource challenges were only reported by site 2.

conclusionsOur use of RPIW and other QI methods to both develop a playbook and an implementation strategy for eScreening has created a testable implementation process to employ automated, patient-facing assessment. The efficient collection and communication of patient information have the potential to greatly improve access to and quality of healthcare.

Indexed as

Electronic screeningeScreeningImplementationQuality improvementRPIW

Identifiers

PMID33827705
PMCPMC8028199
OpenAlexW3144496056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.