Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33827601›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of surgical oncology2021

Long-term oncologic result of laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a propensity score matching analysis.

Si-Yuan Wu, Meng-Hsing Ho, Hao-Ming Chang, Kuo-Feng Hsu, Jyh-Cherng Yu, De-Chuan Chan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of surgical oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Assistance by adaptative damping on a complex bimanual task in laparoscopic surgery.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Si-Yuan WuDivision of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, 325 Chenggong Rd Sec 2, Nei-hu, 114, Taipei, Taiwan.
Meng-Hsing HoDivision of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, 325 Chenggong Rd Sec 2, Nei-hu, 114, Taipei, Taiwan.
Hao-Ming ChangDivision of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, 325 Chenggong Rd Sec 2, Nei-hu, 114, Taipei, Taiwan.
Kuo-Feng HsuDivision of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, 325 Chenggong Rd Sec 2, Nei-hu, 114, Taipei, Taiwan.
Jyh-Cherng YuDivision of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, 325 Chenggong Rd Sec 2, Nei-hu, 114, Taipei, Taiwan.
De-Chuan ChanDivision of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, 325 Chenggong Rd Sec 2, Nei-hu, 114, Taipei, Taiwan. chrischan1168@yahoo.com.tw.
National Defense Medical Center · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLaparoscopic gastrectomy is an acceptable procedure for early-stage gastric cancer; however, most patients are diagnosed at an advanced stage and older age in Taiwan. The feasibility and safety of applying laparoscopic gastrectomy in daily practice remain unclear. This study aimed to examine the short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic gastrectomy versus open procedures.

methodsFrom 2007 to 2015, 192 patients who underwent open gastrectomy and 189 patients who underwent laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer at a single center were included. Propensity score matching analysis was used to adjust selection biases associated with age, preoperative hemoglobin, the extent of resection, tumor size, and stage of the disease. The demographics, perioperative parameters, short-term postoperative results, and 5-year survival data were analyzed.

resultsOpen gastrectomy was more frequently performed in the elderly, larger tumor size, advanced stage of the disease, and disease requiring total gastrectomy or combined organ resection. After propensity score matching, 108 patients with laparoscopic gastrectomy were compared to 108 patients with open gastrectomy. The morbidity rates were not different in both groups (25.9%), while hospital stay was shorter in the laparoscopic group (16.0 vs. 18.8 days, p = 0.04). The 5-year overall survival and disease-free survival were superior in the laparoscopic group (p = 0.03 and p = 0.01, respectively); however, the survival differences were not significant in the subgroup analysis by stage. Laparoscopic gastrectomy had fewer recurrences than open gastrectomy. The pattern of recurrence was not different between the groups.

conclusionsLaparoscopic gastrectomy can be safely applied in both early and locally advanced gastric cancer without compromising oncologic outcomes.

trial registrationRetrospective registration.

Indexed as

LaparoscopyStomach NeoplasmsAgedGastrectomyHumansLength of StayNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPostoperative ComplicationsPrognosisPropensity ScoreTaiwanTreatment OutcomeGastric cancerLaparoscopic surgeryPostoperative complicationsRecurrenceSurvival

Identifiers

PMID33827601
PMCPMC8028734
OpenAlexW3113574439

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.