Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33827596›Full record

ArticleHealth research policy and systems2021

Enabling visibility of the clinician-scientists' knowledge broker role: a participatory design research in the Dutch nursing-home sector.

Margot Barry, Wietske Kuijer, Anke Persoon, Loek Nieuwenhuis, Nynke Scherpbier

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health research policy and systems, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Margot BarryDepartment of Occupational Therapy at the HAN University of Applied Sciences, Kapittelweg 33, 6525EN, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. margot.barry@han.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9554-3726
Wietske KuijerResearch Department of Public Affairs, HAN University of Applied Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7009-3378
Anke PersoonDepartment of Primary and Community Care, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Loek NieuwenhuisFaculty of Educational Science, Open University, Heerlen, The Netherlands.
Nynke ScherpbierDepartment of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4818-3382

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA group of clinician-scientists and managers working within a Dutch academic network, experienced difficulties in clearly defining the knowledge broker role of the clinician-scientists. They found no role clarity in literature, nor did they find tools or methods suitable for clinician-scientists. Clarifying role expectations and providing accountability for funding these knowledge broker positions was difficult. The aim of this research was to design a theory-informed tool that allowed clinician-scientists to make their knowledge broker role visible.

methodsA participatory design research was conducted in three phases, over a 21-month period, with a design group consisting of an external independent researcher, clinician-scientists and their managers from within the academic network. Phase 1 constituted a literature review, a context analysis and a needs analysis. Phase 2 constituted the design and development of a suitable tool and phase 3 was an evaluation of the tool's perceived usefulness. Throughout the research process, the researcher logged the theoretic basis for all design decisions.

resultsThe clinician-scientist's knowledge broker role is a knowledge-intensive role and work-tasks associated with this role are not automatically visible (phase 1). A tool (the SP-tool) was developed in Microsoft Excel. This allowed clinician-scientists to log their knowledge broker activities as distinct from their clinical work and research related activities (phase 2). The SP-tool contributed to the clinician-scientists' ability to make their knowledge broker role visible to themselves and their stakeholders (phase 3). The theoretic contribution of the design research is a conceptual model of professionalisation of the clinician-scientist's knowledge broker role. This model presents the relationship between work visibility and the clarification of functions of the knowledge broker role. In the professionalisation of knowledge-intensive work, visibility contributes to the definition of clinician-scientists broker functions, which is an element necessary for the professionalisation of an occupation.

conclusionsThe SP-tool that was developed in this research, contributes to creating work visibility of the clinician-scientists' knowledge broker role. Further research using the SP-tool could establish a clearer description of the knowledge broker role at the day-to-day professional level and improved ability to support this role within organisations.

Indexed as

KnowledgePhysiciansHumansResearch PersonnelClinician-ScientistDesign researchKnowledge broker

Identifiers

PMID33827596
PMCPMC8025499

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.