Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33827561›Full record

ArticleBMC nursing2021

Knowledge of mothers and fathers' experiences of the early in-home care of premature infants supported by video consultations with a neonatal nurse.

Mai-Britt Hägi-Pedersen, Hanne Kronborg, Annelise Norlyk

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nursing, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mai-Britt Hägi-PedersenDepartment of Pediatrics, Slagelse Hospital, 4200, Slagelse, Denmark. mhp_research@haegi.dk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4349-4755
Hanne KronborgDepartment of Public Health, Faculty of Health, Aarhus University, 8000, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1042-6748
Annelise NorlykDepartment of Public Health, Faculty of Health, Aarhus University, 8000, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8512-228X
Aarhus University · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo gain in-depth knowledge of mothers' and fathers' experiences of the whole trajectory of an early in-home care programme supported by video consultations with a neonatal nurse.

designA qualitative interview study.

methodsData were collected through dyadic semi-structured interviews with mothers and fathers participating in virtual early in-home care programmes and were subjected to inductive content analysis.

findingsThe mothers and fathers were anxious about mastering the care of their premature infants at the start of the early in-home care phase but gradually developed confidence by the completion of the early in-home care programme. Being at home during the early in-home care programme gave the mothers and fathers an opportunity to test their decision making concerning the care of the infant while having the ability to obtain support from nurses when needed.

conclusionOur findings indicate that the trajectory of early in-home care programmes combined with video consultations contributes to parents' increased confidence as mothers and fathers.

trial registrationClinical trial registration: REG-113-2014 and SJ-431 .

Indexed as

Content analysisExperienceInterviewNursing home carePreterm

Identifiers

PMID33827561
PMCPMC8028708
OpenAlexW3148589107

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.