Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33827555›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2021

Contextual property detection in Dutch diagnosis descriptions for uncertainty, laterality and temporality.

Eva S Klappe, Florentien J P van Putten, Nicolette F de Keizer, Ronald Cornet

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Eva S KlappeDepartment of Medical Informatics, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 15, 1105AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. e.s.klappe@amsterdamumc.nl.ORCID 0000-0003-0451-7034
Florentien J P van PuttenDepartment of Medical Informatics, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 15, 1105AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Nicolette F de KeizerDepartment of Medical Informatics, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 15, 1105AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Ronald CornetDepartment of Medical Informatics, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 15, 1105AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAccurate, coded problem lists are valuable for data reuse, including clinical decision support and research. However, healthcare providers frequently modify coded diagnoses by including or removing common contextual properties in free-text diagnosis descriptions: uncertainty (suspected glaucoma), laterality (left glaucoma) and temporality (glaucoma 2002). These contextual properties could cause a difference in meaning between underlying diagnosis codes and modified descriptions, inhibiting data reuse. We therefore aimed to develop and evaluate an algorithm to identify these contextual properties.

methodsA rule-based algorithm called UnLaTem (Uncertainty, Laterality, Temporality) was developed using a single-center dataset, including 288,935 diagnosis descriptions, of which 73,280 (25.4%) were modified by healthcare providers. Internal validation of the algorithm was conducted with an independent sample of 980 unique records. A second validation of the algorithm was conducted with 996 records from a Dutch multicenter dataset including 175,210 modified descriptions of five hospitals. Two researchers independently annotated the two validation samples. Performance of the algorithm was determined using means of the recall and precision of the validation samples. The algorithm was applied to the multicenter dataset to determine the actual prevalence of the contextual properties within the modified descriptions per specialty.

resultsFor the single-center dataset recall (and precision) for removal of uncertainty, uncertainty, laterality and temporality respectively were 100 (60.0), 99.1 (89.9), 100 (97.3) and 97.6 (97.6). For the multicenter dataset for removal of uncertainty, uncertainty, laterality and temporality it was 57.1 (88.9), 86.3 (88.9), 99.7 (93.5) and 96.8 (90.1). Within the modified descriptions of the multicenter dataset, 1.3% contained removal of uncertainty, 9.9% uncertainty, 31.4% laterality and 9.8% temporality.

conclusionsWe successfully developed a rule-based algorithm named UnLaTem to identify contextual properties in Dutch modified diagnosis descriptions. UnLaTem could be extended with more trigger terms, new rules and the recognition of term order to increase the performance even further. The algorithm's rules are available as additional file 2. Implementing UnLaTem in Dutch hospital systems can improve precision of information retrieval and extraction from diagnosis descriptions, which can be used for data reuse purposes such as decision support and research.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsGlaucomaAlgorithmsHumansInformation Storage and RetrievalUncertaintyElectronic health recordProblem listProblem-oriented medical recordReuse of clinical dataRule-based algorithm developmentSingle-center and multicenter validation

Identifiers

PMID33827555
PMCPMC8028823

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.