Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33827540›Full record

ArticleBMC oral health2021

An experimental intraradicular biofilm model in the pig for evaluating irrigation techniques.

Toshinori Tanaka, Yoshio Yahata, Keisuke Handa, Suresh V Venkataiah, Mary M Njuguna, Masafumi Kanehira, Tatsuya Hasegawa, Yuichiro Noiri, Masahiro Saito

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC oral health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Toshinori TanakaDivision of Operative Dentistry, Department of Ecological Dentistry, Tohoku University Graduate School of Dentistry, 4-1 Seiryo-machi, Aobaku, Sendai, Miyagi, 980-8575, Japan.
Yoshio YahataDivision of Operative Dentistry, Department of Ecological Dentistry, Tohoku University Graduate School of Dentistry, 4-1 Seiryo-machi, Aobaku, Sendai, Miyagi, 980-8575, Japan. yahataendo@tohoku.ac.jp.ORCID 0000-0002-6752-0487
Keisuke HandaDivision of Molecular Biology and Oral Biochemistry, Department of Oral Science, Graduate School of Dentistry, Kanagawa Dental University, 82 Inaoka-cho, Yokosuka, Kanagawa, 238-8580, Japan.
Suresh V VenkataiahDivision of Operative Dentistry, Department of Ecological Dentistry, Tohoku University Graduate School of Dentistry, 4-1 Seiryo-machi, Aobaku, Sendai, Miyagi, 980-8575, Japan.
Mary M NjugunaDivision of Operative Dentistry, Department of Ecological Dentistry, Tohoku University Graduate School of Dentistry, 4-1 Seiryo-machi, Aobaku, Sendai, Miyagi, 980-8575, Japan.
Masafumi KanehiraDivision of Operative Dentistry, Department of Ecological Dentistry, Tohoku University Graduate School of Dentistry, 4-1 Seiryo-machi, Aobaku, Sendai, Miyagi, 980-8575, Japan.
Tatsuya HasegawaDivision of Operative Dentistry, Department of Ecological Dentistry, Tohoku University Graduate School of Dentistry, 4-1 Seiryo-machi, Aobaku, Sendai, Miyagi, 980-8575, Japan.
Yuichiro NoiriDivision of Cariology, Operative Dentistry and Endodontics, Department of Oral Health Science, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, 2-5274 Gakko-cho-dori, Chuo-ku, Niigata, Niigata, 951-8514, Japan.
Masahiro SaitoDivision of Operative Dentistry, Department of Ecological Dentistry, Tohoku University Graduate School of Dentistry, 4-1 Seiryo-machi, Aobaku, Sendai, Miyagi, 980-8575, Japan.
Tohoku University · JPKanagawa Dental University · JPNiigata University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe established an in vivo intraradicular biofilm model of apical periodontitis in pigs in which we compared the efficacy of different irrigant activation techniques for biofilm removal.

methodsTwenty roots from the deciduous mandibular second premolar of 5 male pigs were used. After pulpectomy, canals were left open for 2 weeks and then sealed for 4 weeks to enable the development of an intracanal biofilm. The intraradicular biofilms was evaluated using SEM and bacterial 16S rRNA gene-sequencing. To investigate the efficacy of biofilm removal, root canal irrigations were performed using conventional needle, passive ultrasonic, subsonic, or laser-activated irrigation. Real-time PCR was conducted to quantitate the remaining biofilm components. Statistical analysis was performed using ANOVA followed by a Tukey kramer post-hoc test with α = 0.05.

resultsThe pulp exposure model was effective in inducing apical periodontitis and SEM analysis revealed a multi-layer biofilm formation inside the root canal. 16S rRNA sequence analysis identified Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, and Fusobacteria as the predominant bacterial phyla components, which is similar to the microbiome profile seen in humans. None of the tested irrigation techniques completely eradicated the biofilm components from the root canal, but the subsonic and laser-activated irrigation methods produced the lowest bacterial counts (p < 0.05).

conclusionsAn experimental intraradicular biofilm model has been successfully established in pigs. Within the limitations of the study, subsonic or laser-activated irrigation demonstrated the best biofilm removal results in the pig system.

Indexed as

Dental Pulp CavityRoot Canal IrrigantsAnimalsBiofilmsMaleRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRoot Canal PreparationSodium HypochloriteSwineTherapeutic IrrigationRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRoot Canal IrrigantsSodium HypochloriteDebridementIntraradicular biofilm modelIrrigant activation techniqueLaser-activated irrigationPig modelRoot canal disinfection

Identifiers

PMID33827540
PMCPMC8028066
OpenAlexW3147263250

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.