Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33827526›Full record

ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2021

Outcomes of the rotating hinge knee in revision total knee arthroplasty with a median follow-up of 6.2 years.

Jake von Hintze, Mika Niemeläinen, Harri Sintonen, Jyrki Nieminen, Antti Eskelinen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jake von HintzeCoxa Hospital for Joint Replacement, and Faculty of Medicine and Health Technologies, Tampere University, Niveltie 4, 33520, Tampere, Finland. jake.vonhintze@fimnet.fi.
Mika NiemeläinenCoxa Hospital for Joint Replacement, and Faculty of Medicine and Health Technologies, Tampere University, Niveltie 4, 33520, Tampere, Finland.
Harri SintonenDepartment of Public Health, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Jyrki NieminenCoxa Hospital for Joint Replacement, and Faculty of Medicine and Health Technologies, Tampere University, Niveltie 4, 33520, Tampere, Finland.
Antti EskelinenCoxa Hospital for Joint Replacement, and Faculty of Medicine and Health Technologies, Tampere University, Niveltie 4, 33520, Tampere, Finland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe purpose of this study was to determine the mid-term clinical, radiographic and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) outcomes and define the survival rate in patients who had undergone revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using the single rotating hinged knee (RHK) design.

methodsBetween January 2004 and December 2013, 125 revision TKAs were performed at our institution using the single RHK implant. We conducted both a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected outcome data of these patients and a prospective follow-up study of all 39 living patients (41 knees). The follow-up phase included an optional extra follow-up visit, PROM questionnaires, and plain radiographs.

resultsThe ten-year Kaplan-Meier survival rate of the revision RHK knees was 81.7% (95% CI 71.9-91.6%) with re-revision for any reason as the endpoint. Overall, 15 knees (12% of the total) underwent re-revision surgery during the follow-up. The median follow-up was 6.2 years (range, 0-12.7 years) post-operatively for the baseline group. One mechanical hinge mechanism-related failure occurred without any history of trauma or infection. At the time of the final follow-up, the majority of patients evinced a fairly good clinical outcome measured with patient-reported outcome measures and none of the components were radiographically loose.

conclusionWe found that in patients undergoing complex revision TKA, fairly good functional outcome and quality of life can be achieved using an RHK implant. Further, it seems that in this type of patient cohort, revision TKA using an RHK implant relieves pain more than it improves ability to function. The NexGen® RHK design can be regarded as a suitable option in complex revision TKA.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, KneeKnee ProsthesisFollow-Up StudiesHumansKnee JointProspective StudiesProsthesis DesignQuality of LifeReoperationRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeHealth-related quality of lifeHinged kneeKnee replacementPatient-reported outcome measuresRevision total knee arthroplastyRotating hinged knee

Identifiers

PMID33827526
PMCPMC8028074

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.