ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2021
Outcomes of the rotating hinge knee in revision total knee arthroplasty with a median follow-up of 6.2 years.
Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Physical activity after revision knee arthroplasty including return to sport and work: a systematic review and meta-analysis including GRADE.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2023Pooled it
- Mid- to Long-Term Follow-Up Outcomes of Single Design Rotating Hinge Knee in Infected and Noninfected Revision Patients.Orthopaedic surgery · 2026Article
- Etiology of total knee arthroplasty failure and functional outcome of revision knee arthroplasty.World journal of orthopedics · 2025Article
- Mechanical Failure of Modular Rotating Hinge Femoral Component.Arthroplasty today · 2024Article
- Aseptic midterm survival rates between different cemented tibial stem designs in hinged total knee arthroplasty: a 6-year evaluation from the German Arthroplasty Registry.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2024Article
- Comparative Functional and Isokinetic Analysis between Implants with Posterior Stabilization and Rotating Hinge Total Knee Arthroplasty.Revista brasileira de ortopedia · 2024Article
- Does stem profile have an impact on the failure patterns in revision total knee arthroplasty?Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2023Article
- Impact of stem profile on the revisability and the need for osteotomy in well-fixed cemented revision total knee arthroplasty implants.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2023Article
- Prostheses option in revision total knee arthroplasty, from the bench to the bedside: (1) basic science and principles.EFORT open reviews · 2022Review
- Rotating Hinge Prosthesis for Primary and Revision Knee Arthroplasty: Comparison and Indications.BioMed research international · 2022Article
- Individual Revision Knee Arthroplasty Is a Safe Limb Salvage Procedure.Journal of personalized medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe purpose of this study was to determine the mid-term clinical, radiographic and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) outcomes and define the survival rate in patients who had undergone revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using the single rotating hinged knee (RHK) design.
methodsBetween January 2004 and December 2013, 125 revision TKAs were performed at our institution using the single RHK implant. We conducted both a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected outcome data of these patients and a prospective follow-up study of all 39 living patients (41 knees). The follow-up phase included an optional extra follow-up visit, PROM questionnaires, and plain radiographs.
resultsThe ten-year Kaplan-Meier survival rate of the revision RHK knees was 81.7% (95% CI 71.9-91.6%) with re-revision for any reason as the endpoint. Overall, 15 knees (12% of the total) underwent re-revision surgery during the follow-up. The median follow-up was 6.2 years (range, 0-12.7 years) post-operatively for the baseline group. One mechanical hinge mechanism-related failure occurred without any history of trauma or infection. At the time of the final follow-up, the majority of patients evinced a fairly good clinical outcome measured with patient-reported outcome measures and none of the components were radiographically loose.
conclusionWe found that in patients undergoing complex revision TKA, fairly good functional outcome and quality of life can be achieved using an RHK implant. Further, it seems that in this type of patient cohort, revision TKA using an RHK implant relieves pain more than it improves ability to function. The NexGen® RHK design can be regarded as a suitable option in complex revision TKA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.