Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33827524›Full record

ArticleBMC urology2021

The burden of illness in initiating intermittent catheterization: an analysis of German health care claims data.

Almuth Angermund, Gary Inglese, Jimena Goldstine, Laura Iserloh, Berit Libutzki

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC urology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Understanding the properties of intermittent catheters to inform future development.Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Almuth AngermundDepartment of Neuro-Urology, Schön Clinic, Vogtareuth, Germany.
Gary IngleseHollister Incorporated, 2000 Hollister Drive, Libertyville, IL, 60048-3781, USA.
Jimena GoldstineHollister Incorporated, 2000 Hollister Drive, Libertyville, IL, 60048-3781, USA. Jimena.Goldstine@Hollister.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0605-9287
Laura IserlohHGC Healthcare Consultants GmbH, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Berit LibutzkiHGC Healthcare Consultants GmbH, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Hollister (United States) · USSchön Klinik Vogtareuth · DEUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntermittent catheterization (IC) is a common medical technique to drain urine from the bladder when this is no longer possible by natural means. The objective of this study was to evaluate the standard of care and the burden of illness in German individuals who perform intermittent catheterization and obtain recommendations for improvement of care.

methodsA descriptive study with a retrospective, longitudinal cohort design was conducted using the InGef research database from the German statutory health insurance claims data system. The study consisted of individuals with initial IC use in 2013-2015.

resultsWithin 3 years 1100 individuals with initial IC were identified in the database (~ 19,000 in the German population). The most common IC indications were urologic diseases, spinal cord injury, Multiple Sclerosis and Spina Bifida. Urinary tract infections (UTI) were the most frequent complication occurring 1 year before index (61%) and in follow-up (year 1 60%; year 2 50%). Resource use in pre-index including hospitalizations (65%), length of stay (12.8 ± 20.0 days), physician visits (general practitioner: 15.2 ± 29.1), prescriptions of antibiotics (71%) and healthcare costs (€17,950) were high. Comorbidities, complications, and healthcare resource use were highest 1 year before index, decreasing from first to second year after index.

conclusionsThe data demonstrated that prior to initial catheterization, IC users experienced UTIs and high healthcare utilization. While this demonstrates a potential high burden of illness prior to initial IC, UTIs also decreased over time, suggesting that IC use may have a positive influence. The findings also showed that after the first year of initial catheterization the cost decreased. Further studies are needed to better understand the extent of the burden for IC users compared to non-IC users.

Indexed as

Cost of IllnessAdministrative Claims, HealthcareAdultAgedCohort StudiesFemaleGermanyHumansIntermittent Urethral CatheterizationLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesStandard of CareUrinary RetentionContinence care productsInfectionsRetrospective studyUrinary incontinenceurinary tract

Identifiers

PMID33827524
PMCPMC8028779
OpenAlexW3151925114

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.