SynthesisBMC cancer2021
Delayed or failure to follow-up abnormal breast cancer screening mammograms in primary care: a systematic review.
Synthesis in BMC cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Association of smoking with depression among tuberculosis patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC public health · 2025Pooled it
- Developing a framework for understanding diagnostic reconciliation based on evidence review, stakeholder engagement, and practice evaluation.Diagnosis (Berlin, Germany) · 2025Pooled it
- Risk of cancer in individuals with Lynch-like syndrome and their families: a systematic review.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023Pooled it
- Global guidelines for breast cancer screening: A systematic review.Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland) · 2022Pooled it
- Completeness and Timeliness of Diagnostic Follow-up for Mammograms in Palau, 2019-2024.Hawai'i journal of health & social welfare · 2026Article
- Perceptions of the Acceptability of Community-Based Breast Cancer Risk Assessment among Underserved Latinas in Maricopa County, Arizona.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2026Article
- Risk Factors Associated with Delayed Breast Cancer Diagnoses: What Are We Missing?Journal of general internal medicine · 2026Article
- Delayed mammography screening and advanced breast cancer: variation across age and income groups.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Supporting breast and cervical cancer screening follow-up: qualitative health plan interviews.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Patient Perspectives on AI-Powered Medical Robots in Breast and Prostate Cancer Care: Qualitative Study.JMIR cancer · 2026Article
- Factors associated with receipt of surveillance breast MRI among racially and ethnically diverse women with operable breast cancer.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2025Article
- Article
- Interventions to improve timely cancer diagnosis: an integrative review.Diagnosis (Berlin, Germany) · 2025Review
- Are we ready? assessing effectiveness and implementation of cancer control strategies in primary care: a comprehensive review of systematic reviews.Family practice · 2025Review
- Factors Influencing Timely Follow-up After Inconclusive Screening Mammograms at a 3D Mobile Mammography Center.Cureus · 2024Article
- Factors Influencing Adherence to the Risk Management Program for Women With a Genetic Predisposition to Breast Cancer: Real-World Data from a French Multicenter Program.The oncologist · 2024Article
- Multilevel contributors to racial and ethnic inequities in the resolution of abnormal mammography results.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2024Article
- A Community-Based Prostate Cancer Screening and Education Program for Asian American Men in Medically Underserved Communities.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024Article
- Disparities in Breast Cancer Care-How Factors Related to Prevention, Diagnosis, and Treatment Drive Inequity.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Screening mammographic performance by race and age in the National Mammography Database: 29,479,665 screening mammograms from 13,181,241 women.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSuccessful breast cancer screening relies on timely follow-up of abnormal mammograms. Delayed or failure to follow-up abnormal mammograms undermines the potential benefits of screening and is associated with poorer outcomes. However, a comprehensive review of inadequate follow-up of abnormal mammograms in primary care has not previously been reported in the literature. This review could identify modifiable factors that influence follow-up, which if addressed, may lead to improved follow-up and patient outcomes.
methodsA systematic literature review to determine the extent of inadequate follow-up of abnormal screening mammograms in primary care and identify factors impacting on follow-up was conducted. Relevant studies published between 1 January, 1990 and 29 October, 2020 were identified by searching MEDLINE®, Embase, CINAHL® and Cochrane Library, including reference and citation checking. Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklists were used to assess the risk of bias of included studies according to study design.
resultsEighteen publications reporting on 17 studies met inclusion criteria; 16 quantitative and two qualitative studies. All studies were conducted in the United States, except one study from the Netherlands. Failure to follow-up abnormal screening mammograms within 3 and at 6 months ranged from 7.2-33% and 27.3-71.6%, respectively. Women of ethnic minority and lower education attainment were more likely to have inadequate follow-up. Factors influencing follow-up included physician-patient miscommunication, information overload created by automated alerts, the absence of adequate retrieval systems to access patient's results and a lack of coordination of patient records. Logistical barriers to follow-up included inconvenient clinic hours and inconsistent primary care providers. Patient navigation and case management with increased patient education and counselling by physicians was demonstrated to improve follow-up.
conclusionsFollow-up of abnormal mammograms in primary care is suboptimal. However, interventions addressing amendable factors that negatively impact on follow-up have the potential to improve follow-up, especially for populations of women at risk of inadequate follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.