ReviewJournal of pharmacy practice2022
Fluid Stewardship of Maintenance Intravenous Fluids.
Review in Journal of pharmacy practice, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Intravenous fluid mismanagement: time for national stewardship and quality improvement.BMJ open quality · 2025Article
- Unsupervised machine learning analysis to identify patterns of ICU medication use for fluid overload prediction.Pharmacotherapy · 2025Article
- Unsupervised machine learning analysis to identify patterns of ICU medication use for fluid overload prediction.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024Article
- Chemotherapy-induced acute kidney injury: epidemiology, pathophysiology, and therapeutic approaches.Frontiers in nephrology · 2024Review
- Machine learning vs. traditional regression analysis for fluid overload prediction in the ICU.Scientific reports · 2023Observational
- Hidden Fluids in Plain Sight: Identifying Intravenous Medication Classes as Contributors to Intensive Care Unit Fluid Intake.Hospital pharmacy · 2022Article
- Early Diuretics for De-resuscitation in Septic Patients With Left Ventricular Dysfunction.Clinical Medicine Insights. Cardiology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Despite the frequent use of maintenance intravenous fluids (mIVF) in critically ill patients, limited guidance is available. Notably, fluid overload secondary to mIVF mismanagement is associated with significant adverse patient outcomes. The Four Rights (right drug, right dose, right duration, right patient) construct of fluid stewardship has been proposed for the safe evaluation and use of fluids. The purpose of this evidence-based review is to offer practical insights for the clinician regarding mIVF selection, dosing, and duration in line with the Four Rights of Fluid Stewardship.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.