Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33827279›Full record

SynthesisDementia (London, England)2021

How do we provide good mealtime care for people with dementia living in care homes? A systematic review of carer-resident interactions.

James Faraday, Clare Abley, Fiona Beyer, Catherine Exley, Paula Moynihan, Joanne M Patterson

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Dementia (London, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. South African speech-language therapists' practices regarding feeding tube placement in people with advanced dementia.The South African journal of communication disorders = Die Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir Kommunikasieafwykings · 2022
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

James FaradayPopulation Health Sciences Institute, 5994Newcastle University, UK;5983The Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9214-2185
Clare Abley5983The Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK; Population Health Sciences Institute, 5994Newcastle University, UK.
Fiona BeyerPopulation Health Sciences Institute, 5994Newcastle University, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6396-3467
Catherine ExleyFaculty of Medical Sciences, 5994Newcastle University, UK.
Paula MoynihanFaculty of Health and Medical Sciences, 50072The University of Adelaide, Australia; Faculty of Medical Sciences, 5994Newcastle University, UK.
Joanne M PattersonSchool of Health Sciences, 4591The University of Liverpool, UK.
Newcastle University · GBNewcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBThe University of Adelaide · AUUniversity of Liverpool · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

People with dementia who live in care homes often depend on care home staff for help with eating and drinking. It is essential that care home staff have the skills and support they need to provide good care at mealtimes. Good mealtime care may improve quality of life for residents, and reduce hospital admissions. The aim of this systematic review was to identify good practice in mealtime care for people with dementia living in care homes, by focusing on carer-resident interactions at mealtimes. Robust systematic review methods were followed. Seven databases were searched: AgeLine, BNI, CENTRAL, CINAHL, MEDLINE, PsycINFO and Web of Science. Titles, abstracts, and full texts were screened independently by two reviewers, and study quality was assessed with Joanna Briggs Institute tools. Narrative synthesis was used to analyse quantitative and qualitative evidence in parallel. Data were interrogated to identify thematic categories of carer-resident interaction. The synthesis process was undertaken by one reviewer, and discussed throughout with other reviewers for cross-checking. After title/abstract and full-text screening, 18 studies were included. Some studies assessed mealtime care interventions, others investigated factors contributing to oral intake, whilst others explored the mealtime experience. The synthesis identified four categories of carer-resident interaction important to mealtime care: Social connection, Tailored care, Empowering the resident, and Responding to food refusal. Each of the categories has echoes in related literature, and provides promising directions for future research. They merit further consideration, as new interventions are developed to improve mealtime care for this population.

Indexed as

CaregiversDementiaHospitalizationHumansMealsQuality of Lifecaregiversdementialong-term caremealssystematic review

Identifiers

PMID33827279
PMCPMC8679165
OpenAlexW3150971349

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.