Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33826663›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

No interaction between fundamental-frequency differences and spectral region when perceiving speech in a speech background.

Sara M K Madsen, Torsten Dau, Andrew J Oxenham

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sara M K MadsenDepartment of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-2824-7526
Torsten DauHearing Systems Section, Department of Health Technology, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark.
Andrew J OxenhamDepartment of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-9365-1157

Funding

Complex Pitch Perception in Complex EnvironmentsR01DC005216 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI Andrew J. Oxenham · 2002 to 2026
$9.3M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC005216
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Differences in fundamental frequency (F0) or pitch between competing voices facilitate our ability to segregate a target voice from interferers, thereby enhancing speech intelligibility. Although lower-numbered harmonics elicit a stronger and more accurate pitch sensation than higher-numbered harmonics, it is unclear whether the stronger pitch leads to an increased benefit of pitch differences when segregating competing talkers. To answer this question, sentence recognition was tested in young normal-hearing listeners in the presence of a single competing talker. The stimuli were presented in a broadband condition or were highpass or lowpass filtered to manipulate the pitch accuracy of the voicing, while maintaining roughly equal speech intelligibility in the highpass and lowpass regions. Performance was measured with average F0 differences (ΔF0) between the target and single-talker masker of 0, 2, and 4 semitones. Pitch discrimination abilities were also measured to confirm that the lowpass-filtered stimuli elicited greater pitch accuracy than the highpass-filtered stimuli. No interaction was found between filter type and ΔF0 in the sentence recognition task, suggesting little or no effect of harmonic rank or pitch accuracy on the ability to use F0 to segregate natural voices, even when the average ΔF0 is relatively small. The results suggest that listeners are able to obtain some benefit of pitch differences between competing voices, even when pitch salience and accuracy is low.

Indexed as

AdultAuditory PerceptionCochlear ImplantsFemaleHumansMaleNoisePerceptual MaskingPitch DiscriminationRecognition, PsychologySpeech IntelligibilitySpeech PerceptionYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID33826663
PMCPMC8026035

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.