ArticlePloS one2021
A comparison of 71 binary similarity coefficients: The effect of base rates.
Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Network-based characterization of latent co-testing patterns in antimicrobial susceptibility testing.iScience · 2026Article
- Integrating Partner Services and Molecular Epidemiology Data to Enhance HIV Transmission Disruption in Rhode Island.Open forum infectious diseases · 2025Article
- Unsupervised EEG preictal interval identification in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- ConNEcT: An R package to build contingency measure-based networks on binary time series.Behavior research methods · 2023Article
- Comparative Analysis of Binary Similarity Measures for Compound Identification in MassSpectrometry-Based Metabolomics.Metabolites · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
There are many psychological applications that require collapsing the information in a two-mode (e.g., respondents-by-attributes) binary matrix into a one-mode (e.g., attributes-by-attributes) similarity matrix. This process requires the selection of a measure of similarity between binary attributes. A vast number of binary similarity coefficients have been proposed in fields such as biology, geology, and ecology. Although previous studies have reported cluster analyses of binary similarity coefficients, there has been little exploration of how cluster memberships are affected by the base rates (percentage of ones) for the binary attributes. We conducted a simulation experiment that compared two-cluster K-median partitions of 71 binary similarity coefficients based on their pairwise correlations obtained under 15 different base-rate configurations. The results reveal that some subsets of coefficients consistently group together regardless of the base rates. However, there are other subsets of coefficients that group together for some base rates, but not for others.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.