ArticleStatistical methods in medical research2021
Sample size estimation for modified Poisson analysis of cluster randomized trials with a binary outcome.
Article in Statistical methods in medical research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Does implementation of office based addiction treatment by a nurse care manager increase the duration of OUD treatment in primary care? A secondary analysis of the PROUD randomized control trial.Drug and alcohol dependence · 2024Trial
- Informative cluster size in cluster-randomised trials: A case study from the TRIGGER trial.Clinical trials (London, England) · 2023Trial
- Assessing treatment effect heterogeneity in the presence of missing effect modifier data in cluster-randomized trials.Statistical methods in medical research · 2024Article
- Leveraging baseline covariates to analyze small cluster-randomized trials with a rare binary outcome.Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift · 2024Article
- Article
- Accounting for expected attrition in the planning of cluster randomized trials for assessing treatment effect heterogeneity.BMC medical research methodology · 2023Article
- Estimands in cluster-randomized trials: choosing analyses that answer the right question.International journal of epidemiology · 2023Article
- Design and analysis of cluster randomized trials with time-to-event outcomes under the additive hazards mixed model.Statistics in medicine · 2022Article
- Accounting for unequal cluster sizes in designing cluster randomized trials to detect treatment effect heterogeneity.Statistics in medicine · 2022Article
- Impact of unequal cluster sizes for GEE analyses of stepped wedge cluster randomized trials with binary outcomes.Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The modified Poisson regression coupled with a robust sandwich variance has become a viable alternative to log-binomial regression for estimating the marginal relative risk in cluster randomized trials. However, a corresponding sample size formula for relative risk regression via the modified Poisson model is currently not available for cluster randomized trials. Through analytical derivations, we show that there is no loss of asymptotic efficiency for estimating the marginal relative risk via the modified Poisson regression relative to the log-binomial regression. This finding holds both under the independence working correlation and under the exchangeable working correlation provided a simple modification is used to obtain the consistent intraclass correlation coefficient estimate. Therefore, the sample size formulas developed for log-binomial regression naturally apply to the modified Poisson regression in cluster randomized trials. We further extend the sample size formulas to accommodate variable cluster sizes. An extensive Monte Carlo simulation study is carried out to validate the proposed formulas. We find that the proposed formulas have satisfactory performance across a range of cluster size variability, as long as suitable finite-sample corrections are applied to the sandwich variance estimator and the number of clusters is at least 10. Our findings also suggest that the sample size estimate under the exchangeable working correlation is more robust to cluster size variability, and recommend the use of an exchangeable working correlation over an independence working correlation for both design and analysis. The proposed sample size formulas are illustrated using the Stop Colorectal Cancer (STOP CRC) trial.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.