Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33826366›Full record

ArticleJCO oncology practice2021

Financial Toxicity of Cancer Care: An Analysis of Financial Burden in Three Distinct Health Care Systems.

Divya A Parikh, Meera Ragavan, Ritika Dutta, Jeffrey Garnet Edwards, James Dickerson, Debeshi Maitra, Sangeeta Aggarwal, Fa-Chyi Lee, Manali I Patel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JCO oncology practice, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The Association Between Cost-Related Non-Adherence Behaviors and Diabetes Outcomes.Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Comprehensive and Equitable Care for Vulnerable Veterans With Integrated Palliative, Psychology, and Oncology Care.Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Divya A ParikhDepartment of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.ORCID 0000-0002-7432-4601
Meera RagavanDepartment of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.ORCID 0000-0002-8991-0259
Ritika DuttaDepartment of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
Jeffrey Garnet EdwardsDepartment of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.ORCID 0000-0002-2642-2880
James DickersonDepartment of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
Debeshi MaitraDepartment of Hematology/Oncology, Santa Clara Valley Medical Center, San Jose, CA.
Sangeeta AggarwalDepartment of Hematology/Oncology, Santa Clara Valley Medical Center, San Jose, CA.
Fa-Chyi LeeDepartment of Hematology/Oncology, Santa Clara Valley Medical Center, San Jose, CA.
Manali I PatelDepartment of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.ORCID 0000-0002-9943-5762

Funding

Stanford Health Services Research Training ProgramT32HS026128 · AHRQ · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI BAKER, LAURENCE C, OWENS, DOUGLAS K · 2018 to 2024
$3.6M
Reducing Disparities in End of Life Cancer CareK23MD013474 · NIMHD · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI PATEL, MANALI I · 2018 to 2020
$502k
AHRQ HHS T32 HS026128NIMHD NIH HHS K23 MD013474
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe financial toxicity of cancer care is a source of significant distress for patients with cancer. The purpose of this study is to understand factors associated with financial toxicity in three distinct care systems.

methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional survey of patients in three care systems, Stanford Cancer Institute (SCI), VA Palo Alto Health Care System (VAPAHCS), and Santa Clara Valley Medical Center (SCVMC), from October 2017 to May 2019. We assessed demographic factors, employment status, and out-of-pocket costs (OOPCs) and administered the validated COmprehensive Score for financial Toxicity tool. We calculated descriptive statistics and conducted linear regression models to analyze factors associated with financial toxicity.

resultsFour hundred forty-four of 578 patients (77%) completed the entire COmprehensive Score for financial Toxicity tool and were included in the analysis. Most respondents at SCI were White, with annual household income (AHI) > $50,000 USD and Medicare insurance. At the VAPAHCS, most were White, with AHI ≤ $50,000 USD and insured by the Veterans Administration. At SCVMC, most were Asian and/or Pacific Islander, with AHI ≤ $25,000 USD and Medicaid insurance. Low AHI (

conclusionLow AHI, high OOPCs, and employment changes contribute to financial toxicity; however, there are variations based on site of care. Future studies should tailor financial toxicity interventions within care delivery systems.

Indexed as

Cost of IllnessNeoplasmsAgedCross-Sectional StudiesHealth ExpendituresHumansMedicareUnited States

Identifiers

PMID33826366
PMCPMC9797228

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.