ArticleAnnals of clinical and translational neurology2021
Evaluation of the EFNS/PNS diagnostic criteria in a cohort of CIDP patients.
Article in Annals of clinical and translational neurology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Isolated trigeminal neuropathy as an initial manifestation of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy: A case report.Radiology case reports · 2026Article
- Review
- Ultramicronized Palmitoylethanolamide in the Management of Neuropathic Pain Related to Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy: A Proof-of-Concept Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Clinical, biological, electrophysiological and therapeutic profile of patients with anti-MAG neuropathy according to MYD88Journal of neurology · 2024Article
- Small fibre integrity and axonal pathology in the rat model of experimental autoimmune neuritis.Brain communications · 2024Article
- Serum neurofilament light chain does not detect self-reported treatment-related fluctuations in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy.European journal of neurology · 2024Article
- Objectivity, practicality, and significance of practice guidelines for the practicing neurologists: What we learnt from consensus criteria in CIDP, Myasthenia Gravis and Inflammatory Myopathies.Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders · 2023Review
- Sex differences in Guillain Barré syndrome, chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy and experimental autoimmune neuritis.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Review
- Correlations between Electrophysiological Parameters, Lymphocyte Distribution and Cytokine Levels in Patients with Chronic Demyelinating Inflammatory Polyneuropathy.Journal of personalized medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the European Federation of Neurological Societies (EFNS)/Peripheral Nerve Society (PNS) diagnostic criteria for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) in a cohort of patients diagnosed and treated for CIDP in a tertiary university hospital.
methodsIn a monocentric retrospective study of 203 CIDP patients, diagnosed according to expert opinion, we evaluated the EFNS/PNS diagnostic criteria. Clinical course and nerve conduction studies (NCS) over 1 year from first referral were studied. Secondarily, we compared the clinical and paraclinical characteristics, including nerve ultrasound, of patients who failed with those who fulfilled the criteria in order to identify clinically relevant differences.
resultsAt 1 year, 182 (89.7%) patients fulfilled the criteria (156/76.9% definite, 22/10.8% probable, and 4/2% possible). Twenty-one (10.3%) patients did not because the electrodiagnostic criteria remained negative. These still showed signs of demyelination but did not reach the cut-off values. They also presented typical, albeit less pronounced, multifocal nerve enlargement in ultrasonography. Mean disability at presentation and 1 year after was significantly lower. Most importantly, a relevant proportion of these patients also responded to therapy (6/21 = 28.6% vs. 82/182 = 45.3% of those fulfilling the criteria).
interpretationCIDP diagnosis could be established for 89.7% of patients over the course of 1 year using EFNS/PNS criteria. The remaining patients (10.3%) presented with milder disability, less accentuated demyelination, but otherwise similar characteristics and still considerable probability of treatment response. Failure to fulfill diagnostic criteria should not automatically preclude treatment. Nerve ultrasound should be considered as a complementary diagnostic tool to detect signs of inflammation in CIDP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.