Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33826247›Full record

ArticleAnnals of clinical and translational neurology2021

Evaluation of the EFNS/PNS diagnostic criteria in a cohort of CIDP patients.

Diamantis Athanasopoulos, Jeremias Motte, Thomas Grüter, Nuray Köse, Min-Suk Yoon, Susanne Otto, Christiane Schneider-Gold, Ralf Gold, Anna L Fisse, Kalliopi Pitarokoili

Open access · goldAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of clinical and translational neurology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Diamantis AthanasopoulosDepartment of Neurology, St. Josef-Hospital, Ruhr-University, Bochum, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3864-7523
Jeremias MotteDepartment of Neurology, St. Josef-Hospital, Ruhr-University, Bochum, Germany.
Thomas GrüterDepartment of Neurology, St. Josef-Hospital, Ruhr-University, Bochum, Germany.
Nuray KöseDepartment of Neurology, St. Josef-Hospital, Ruhr-University, Bochum, Germany.
Min-Suk YoonDepartment of Neurology, Evangelic Hospital Hattingen, Hattingen, Germany.
Susanne OttoDepartment of Neurology, St. Josef-Hospital, Ruhr-University, Bochum, Germany.
Christiane Schneider-GoldDepartment of Neurology, St. Josef-Hospital, Ruhr-University, Bochum, Germany.
Ralf GoldDepartment of Neurology, St. Josef-Hospital, Ruhr-University, Bochum, Germany.
Anna L FisseDepartment of Neurology, St. Josef-Hospital, Ruhr-University, Bochum, Germany.
Kalliopi PitarokoiliDepartment of Neurology, St. Josef-Hospital, Ruhr-University, Bochum, Germany.
St. Josef-Hospital · DEEvangelische Stiftung Volmarstein · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the European Federation of Neurological Societies (EFNS)/Peripheral Nerve Society (PNS) diagnostic criteria for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) in a cohort of patients diagnosed and treated for CIDP in a tertiary university hospital.

methodsIn a monocentric retrospective study of 203 CIDP patients, diagnosed according to expert opinion, we evaluated the EFNS/PNS diagnostic criteria. Clinical course and nerve conduction studies (NCS) over 1 year from first referral were studied. Secondarily, we compared the clinical and paraclinical characteristics, including nerve ultrasound, of patients who failed with those who fulfilled the criteria in order to identify clinically relevant differences.

resultsAt 1 year, 182 (89.7%) patients fulfilled the criteria (156/76.9% definite, 22/10.8% probable, and 4/2% possible). Twenty-one (10.3%) patients did not because the electrodiagnostic criteria remained negative. These still showed signs of demyelination but did not reach the cut-off values. They also presented typical, albeit less pronounced, multifocal nerve enlargement in ultrasonography. Mean disability at presentation and 1 year after was significantly lower. Most importantly, a relevant proportion of these patients also responded to therapy (6/21 = 28.6% vs. 82/182 = 45.3% of those fulfilling the criteria).

interpretationCIDP diagnosis could be established for 89.7% of patients over the course of 1 year using EFNS/PNS criteria. The remaining patients (10.3%) presented with milder disability, less accentuated demyelination, but otherwise similar characteristics and still considerable probability of treatment response. Failure to fulfill diagnostic criteria should not automatically preclude treatment. Nerve ultrasound should be considered as a complementary diagnostic tool to detect signs of inflammation in CIDP.

Indexed as

AdultAgedElectrodiagnosisFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeuroimagingPolyradiculoneuropathy, Chronic Inflammatory DemyelinatingPractice Guidelines as TopicRetrospective StudiesSocieties, Medical

Identifiers

PMID33826247
PMCPMC8108415
OpenAlexW3147344014

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.