ArticleJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology2022
Clinical impact of quantitative [
Article in Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Feasibility of [Frontiers in nuclear medicine · 2025Article
- Combining body mass index with waist circumference to assess coronary microvascular function in patients with non-obstructive coronary artery disease.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study was performed to determine the impact of oxygen-15-labeled water ([
methodsThis study involved 57 patients who underwent [
resultsNormal and abnormal MPI findings were observed in 18 (32%) and 39 (68%) patients, respectively. The referral rate was significantly different between the normal and abnormal MPI groups (5.6% and 48.7%, respectively; P = .002). Revascularization rate of abnormal MPI group was 40.0%. There were significant differences of hyperemic MBF and CFR between patients with and without referral. Hyperemic MBF was significant predictor for referral (OR 15.24, 95% CI 3.39-68.55, P < .005) and revascularization (OR 28.57, 95% CI 3.08-265.33, P < .005).
conclusion[
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.