Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33826118›Full record

ArticleEating and weight disorders : EWD2022

Simply too much: the extent to which weight bias internalization results in a higher risk of eating disorders and psychosocial problems.

Michaela Silvia Gmeiner, Petra Warschburger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Eating and weight disorders : EWD, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Overview of Pediatric Obesity as a Disease.Pediatric clinics of North America · 2024
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Michaela Silvia GmeinerDepartment of Psychology, University of Potsdam, Karl-Liebknechtstr. 24-25, 14476, Potsdam, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1043-6604
Petra WarschburgerDepartment of Psychology, University of Potsdam, Karl-Liebknechtstr. 24-25, 14476, Potsdam, Germany. warschb@uni-potsdam.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7979-7451

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) GRK 1668
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWeight bias internalization (WBI) is associated with negative health consequences such as eating disorders and psychosocial problems in children. To date, it is unknown to what extent WBI considerably raises the risk of negative outcomes.

methodsAnalyses are based on cross-sectional data of 1,061 children (9-13 years, M = 11, SD = 0.9; 52.1% female) who filled in the WBI scale (WBIS-C). First, ROC analyses were run to identify critical cut-off values of WBI (WBIS-C score) that identify those who are at higher risk for psychosocial problems or eating disorder symptoms (as reported by parents). Second, it was examined whether WBI is more sensitive than the relative weight status in that respect. Third, to confirm that the cut-off value is also accompanied by higher psychological strain, high- and low-risk groups were compared in terms of their self-reported depressive symptoms, anxious symptoms, body dissatisfaction, and self-esteem.

resultsWBIS-C scores ≥ 1.55 were associated with a higher risk of disturbed eating behavior; for psychosocial problems, no cut-off score reached adequate sensitivity and specificity. Compared to relative weight status, WBI was better suited to detect disturbed eating behavior. Children with a WBIS-C score ≥ 1.55 also reported higher scores for both depressive and anxious symptoms, higher body dissatisfaction, and lower self-esteem.

conclusionThe WBIS-C is suitable for identifying risk groups, and even low levels of WBI are accompanied by adverse mental health. Therefore, WBI is, beyond weight status, an important risk factor that should be considered in prevention and intervention. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, cross-sectional analyses based on data taken from a well-designed, prospective cohort study.

Indexed as

Feeding and Eating DisordersWeight PrejudiceBody ImageBody WeightChildCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleProspective StudiesSelf ConceptChildrenMental healthROCSelf-stigmatizationWeight bias internalization

Identifiers

PMID33826118
PMCPMC8860958

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.