Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33826108›Full record

ArticlePerspectives on medical education2021

Perception of social media behaviour among medical students, residents and medical specialists.

Sebastiaan A Pronk, Simone L Gorter, Scheltus J van Luijk, Pieter C Barnhoorn, Beer Binkhorst, Walther N K A van Mook

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Perspectives on medical education, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Time to Address Eating Disorder Risk Among Medical Students.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sebastiaan A PronkFaculty of Health, Medicine & Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands. sebastiaan.pronk@outlook.com.ORCID 0000-0001-6400-2708
Simone L GorterDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Scheltus J van LuijkAcademy for Postgraduate Medical Training, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Pieter C BarnhoornDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8863-1688
Beer BinkhorstFaculty of Health, Medicine & Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Walther N K A van MookAcademy for Postgraduate Medical Training, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2398-8878

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionBehaviour is visible in real-life events, but also on social media. While some national medical organizations have published social media guidelines, the number of studies on professional social media use in medical education is limited. This study aims to explore social media use among medical students, residents and medical specialists.

methodsAn anonymous, online survey was sent to 3844 medical students at two Dutch medical schools, 828 residents and 426 medical specialists. Quantitative, descriptive data analysis regarding demographic data, yes/no questions and Likert scale questions were performed using SPSS. Qualitative data analysis was performed iteratively, independently by two researchers applying the principles of constant comparison, open and axial coding until consensus was reached.

resultsOverall response rate was 24.8%. Facebook was most popular among medical students and residents; LinkedIn was most popular among medical specialists. Personal pictures and/or information about themselves on social media that were perceived as unprofessional were reported by 31.3% of students, 19.7% of residents and 4.1% of medical specialists. Information and pictures related to alcohol abuse, partying, clinical work or of a sexually suggestive character were considered inappropriate. Addressing colleagues about their unprofessional posts was perceived to be mainly dependent on the nature and hierarchy of the interprofessional relation. DISCUSSION: There is a widespread perception that the presence of unprofessional information on social media among the participants and their colleagues is a common occurrence. Medical educators should create awareness of the risks of unprofessional (online) behaviour among healthcare professionals, as well as the necessity and ways of addressing colleagues in case of such lapses.

Indexed as

Social MediaStudents, MedicalHumansPerceptionSchools, MedicalSocial BehaviorMedical specialistsMedical studentsOnline professionalismResidentsSocial media

Identifiers

PMID33826108
PMCPMC8368941

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.