ArticleJournal of plant research2021
Using near-infrared spectroscopy to discriminate closely related species: a case study of neotropical ferns.
Article in Journal of plant research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- A comparison of interspecific and intraspecific phenotypic variation in spectral signatures of ferns with robust versus uncertain species boundaries.Journal of plant research · 2026Article
- Identification of Gentian-Related Species Based on Two-Dimensional Correlation Spectroscopy (2D-COS) Combined with Residual Neural Network (ResNet).Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Insights into the Taxonomically Challenging Hexaploid Alpine Shrub Willows ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Spatial Frequency Domain Imaging System Calibration, Correction and Application for Pear Surface Damage Detection.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Infrared Spectroscopy and Chemometric Applications for the Qualitative and Quantitative Investigation of Grapevine Organs.Frontiers in plant science · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Identifying plant species requires considerable knowledge and can be difficult without complete specimens. Fourier-transform near-infrared spectroscopy (FT-NIR) is an effective technique for discriminating plant species, especially angiosperms. However, its efficacy has never been tested on ferns. Here we tested the accuracy of FT-NIR at discriminating species of the genus Microgramma. We obtained 16 spectral readings per individual from the adaxial and abaxial surfaces of 100 specimens belonging to 13 species. The analyses included all 1557 spectral variables. We tested different datasets (adaxial + abaxial, adaxial, and abaxial) to compare the correct identification of species through the construction of discriminant models (Linear discriminant analysis and partial least squares discriminant analysis) and cross-validation techniques (leave-one-out, K-fold). All analyses recovered an overall high percentage (> 90%) of correct predictions of specimen identifications for all datasets, regardless of the model or cross-validation used. On average, there was > 95% accuracy when using partial least squares discriminant analysis and both cross-validations. Our results show the high predictive power of FT-NIR at correctly discriminating fern species when using leaves of dried herbarium specimens. The technique is sensitive enough to reflect species delimitation problems and possible hybridization, and it has the potential of helping better delimit and identify fern species.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33826013What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.