Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33826008›Full record

ArticleEJNMMI research2021

The pharmacokinetics of [

Sébastien Goutal, Martine Guillermier, Guillaume Becker, Mylène Gaudin, Yann Bramoullé, André Luxen, Christian Lemaire, Alain Plenevaux, Eric Salmon, Philippe Hantraye and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EJNMMI research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Detection of Focal Lesions in Epilepsy with [Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2026
    Article
  2. Evaluation of [EJNMMI research · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Sébastien GoutalUniversité Paris-Saclay, CEA, CNRS, MIRCen, Laboratoire Des Maladies Neurodégénératives, 18 Route du Panorama, 92265, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France.
Martine GuillermierUniversité Paris-Saclay, CEA, CNRS, MIRCen, Laboratoire Des Maladies Neurodégénératives, 18 Route du Panorama, 92265, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France.
Guillaume BeckerGIGA Cyclotron Research Centre In Vivo Imaging, University of Liege, Allee du 6 Aout, 8, Sart Tilman B30, 4000, Liege, Belgium.
Mylène GaudinUniversité Paris-Saclay, CEA, CNRS, MIRCen, Laboratoire Des Maladies Neurodégénératives, 18 Route du Panorama, 92265, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France.
Yann BramoulléUniversité Paris-Saclay, CEA, CNRS, MIRCen, Laboratoire Des Maladies Neurodégénératives, 18 Route du Panorama, 92265, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France.
André LuxenGIGA Cyclotron Research Centre In Vivo Imaging, University of Liege, Allee du 6 Aout, 8, Sart Tilman B30, 4000, Liege, Belgium.
Christian LemaireGIGA Cyclotron Research Centre In Vivo Imaging, University of Liege, Allee du 6 Aout, 8, Sart Tilman B30, 4000, Liege, Belgium.
Alain PlenevauxGIGA Cyclotron Research Centre In Vivo Imaging, University of Liege, Allee du 6 Aout, 8, Sart Tilman B30, 4000, Liege, Belgium.
Eric SalmonGIGA Cyclotron Research Centre In Vivo Imaging, University of Liege, Allee du 6 Aout, 8, Sart Tilman B30, 4000, Liege, Belgium.
Philippe HantrayeUniversité Paris-Saclay, CEA, CNRS, MIRCen, Laboratoire Des Maladies Neurodégénératives, 18 Route du Panorama, 92265, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France.
Olivier Barret *Université Paris-Saclay, CEA, CNRS, MIRCen, Laboratoire Des Maladies Neurodégénératives, 18 Route du Panorama, 92265, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France.
Nadja Van Camp *Université Paris-Saclay, CEA, CNRS, MIRCen, Laboratoire Des Maladies Neurodégénératives, 18 Route du Panorama, 92265, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France. nadja.van-camp@cea.fr.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2261-7314
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRUniversity of Liège · BE

Funding

Investissement d'Avenir ANR-11-INBS-0011, A.L.P.)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPositron Emission Tomography (PET) imaging of the Synaptic Vesicle glycoprotein (SV) 2A is a new tool to quantify synaptic density. [

results[

conclusionsModeling issues with a 2TCM due to a slow component have previously been reported for other SV2A ligands with low specific binding, or after blocking of specific binding. As all SV2A ligands share chemical structural similarities, we hypothesize that this slow binding component is common for all SV2A ligands, but only hampers quantification when specific binding is low.

Indexed as

Cynomolgus non-human PrimatesPETSV2ASynaptic imaging

Identifiers

PMID33826008
PMCPMC8026785
OpenAlexW3123070629

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.