ArticleJAMA surgery2021
CHEERS Reporting Guidelines for Economic Evaluations.
Article in JAMA surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Systematic review of cost-effectiveness analyses of weight loss interventions for knee osteoarthritis.BMJ open · 2026Pooled it
- Economic benefits of substance use disorder treatment: A systematic literature review of economic evaluation studies from 2003 to 2021.Journal of substance use and addiction treatment · 2023Pooled it
- Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of extended nursing roles in dementia care: Results of the cluster-randomized trial InDePendent.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025Trial
- Clinical Outcomes and Cost-Effectiveness of Collaborative Dementia Care: A Secondary Analysis of a Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2024Trial
- Cost-Effectiveness of Pharmacologic Therapies for Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatohepatitis With Significant Fibrosis in the United States.Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2026Article
- Use of cost analysis in examinations of health coaching interventions: a scoping review.BMJ open · 2026Article
- Labetalol, Nifedipine, and Methyldopa for the Management of Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy in Iran: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Are tailored primary care services for social inclusion good value for money? A health economics evaluation with Monte-Carlo probabilistic sensitivity analysis comparing tailored social inclusion primary care services to mainstream primary care services for socially excluded people.International journal for equity in health · 2025Article
- Study protocol for the health economic evaluation of outpatient long-term video EEGs for people with seizure disorders alongside the ALVEEG study - a randomized controlled equivalence trial.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Cost-effectiveness of Procalcitonin (PCT) guidance for antibiotics management of adult sepsis patients in the Egyptian context.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- Reporting quality of economic evaluations of the negotiated Traditional Chinese Medicines in national reimbursement drug list of China: A systematic review.Integrative medicine research · 2023Article
- Were economic evaluations well reported for the newly listed oncology drugs in China's national reimbursement drug list.BMC health services research · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.