Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33825695›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2021

Requirements and Operational Guidelines for Secure and Sustainable Digital Phenotyping: Design and Development Study.

Raj R Jagesar, Jacob A Vorstman, Martien J Kas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Comparing training window selection methods for prediction in non-stationary time series.The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Raj R JagesarGroningen Institute for Evolutionary Life Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5320-3341
Jacob A Vorstman *Program in Genetics and Genome Biology, Research Institute, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1677-3126
Martien J Kas *Groningen Institute for Evolutionary Life Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4471-8618

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDigital phenotyping, the measurement of human behavioral phenotypes using personal devices, is rapidly gaining popularity. Novel initiatives, ranging from software prototypes to user-ready research platforms, are innovating the field of biomedical research and health care apps. One example is the BEHAPP project, which offers a fully managed digital phenotyping platform as a service. The innovative potential of digital phenotyping strategies resides among others in their capacity to objectively capture measurable and quantitative components of human behavior, such as diurnal rhythm, movement patterns, and communication, in a real-world setting. The rapid development of this field underscores the importance of reliability and safety of the platforms on which these novel tools are operated. Large-scale studies and regulated research spaces (eg, the pharmaceutical industry) have strict requirements for the software-based solutions they use. Security and sustainability are key to ensuring continuity and trust. However, the majority of behavioral monitoring initiatives have not originated primarily in these regulated research spaces, which may be why these components have been somewhat overlooked, impeding the further development and implementation of such platforms in a secure and sustainable way.

objectiveThis study aims to provide a primer on the requirements and operational guidelines for the development and operation of a secure behavioral monitoring platform.

methodsWe draw from disciplines such as privacy law, information, and computer science to identify a set of requirements and operational guidelines focused on security and sustainability. Taken together, the requirements and guidelines form the foundation of the design and implementation of the BEHAPP behavioral monitoring platform.

resultsWe present the base BEHAPP data collection and analysis flow and explain how the various concepts from security and sustainability are addressed in the design.

conclusionsDigital phenotyping initiatives are steadily maturing. This study helps the field and surrounding stakeholders to reflect upon and progress toward secure and sustainable operation of digital phenotyping-driven research.

Indexed as

CommunicationPrivacyData CollectionHumansReproducibility of Resultsdigital phenotypingmobile behavioral monitoringmobile phonepassive behavioral monitoringpsychoinformaticsresearch data managementsmartphone-based behavioral monitoring

Identifiers

PMID33825695
PMCPMC8060862

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.