Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33825692›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2021

A Heart Rate Monitoring App (FibriCheck) for Atrial Fibrillation in General Practice: Pilot Usability Study.

Simon Gabriël Beerten, Tine Proesmans, Bert Vaes

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03509493 (Detection of the Common Arrhythmia Atrial Fibrillation in Different Patient Target Groups Using the FibriCheck Smartphone Application), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03509493 completednot on this map

Detection of the Common Arrhythmia Atrial Fibrillation in Different Patient Target Groups Using the FibriCheck Smartphone Application

TypeobservationalSponsorQompium NVRan2017 to 2017Enrolled465ConditionsAtrial FibrillationArmsFibriCheck
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Mayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health · 2023
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Huisarts en wetenschap · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Simon Gabriël BeertenDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3695-2452
Tine ProesmansQompium, Hasselt, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5769-3790
Bert VaesDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5244-1930

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAtrial fibrillation (AF) is a major risk factor for stroke. The current opportunistic screening procedure consists of pulse palpation and an electrocardiogram when an irregular rhythm is found. Smartphone apps that measure heart rhythm could be useful in increasing the detection of AF in a primary care setting.

objectiveWe conducted a pilot study with the smartphone app FibriCheck to assess whether the introduction of such an app is feasible.

methodsFour general practices across Flanders provided patient data for the study. Inclusion criteria for participants were aged 65 or older and a CHARGE-AF score of at least 10%. We excluded patients with known AF or a pacemaker. Participants were asked to measure at least twice a day with FibriCheck (for at least 14 days). They were provided the 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36) questionnaire both before and after the study, as well as different surveys concerning their user experience and general perception of technology.

resultsThere were 92 participants (36 women and 56 men). The study population was relatively homogenous concerning risk factors and medication use at baseline. During the study period, 5/86 (6%) participants were found to have AF (6 dropouts). The average study period was 23 days and the average number of measurements per day was 2.1. Patient compliance was variable, but high. On the whole, there were no appreciable changes in quality of life. The overall user experience and satisfaction were very high.

conclusionsFibriCheck is a relatively easy-to-use smartphone app to complement AF screening in primary care. Its implementation in this setting is certainly achievable, and one can expect high rates of patient compliance. Based on these results, a planned cluster randomized trial will be going ahead.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT03509493; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03509493.

Indexed as

atrial fibrillationFibriCheckprimary caresmartphone app

Identifiers

PMID33825692
PMCPMC8060868

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.