Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33825357›Full record

ArticleJournal of gynecologic oncology2021

Rectosigmoid resection during Visceral-Peritoneal Debulking (VPD) in patients with stage IIIC-IV ovarian cancer: morbidity of gynecologic oncology vs. colorectal team.

Roberto Tozzi, Gaetano Valenti, Daniele Vinti, Riccardo Garruto Campanile, Massimo Cristaldi, Federico Ferrari

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gynecologic oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Roberto TozziDepartment of Gynaecologic Oncology, Churchill Hospital, Oxford University, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6123-1628
Gaetano ValentiDepartment of Gynaecologic Oncology, Churchill Hospital, Oxford University, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4756-587X
Daniele VintiDepartment of Gynaecologic Oncology, Churchill Hospital, Oxford University, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1209-0296
Riccardo Garruto CampanileDepartment of Gynaecologic Oncology, Churchill Hospital, Oxford University, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0009-8389
Massimo CristaldiDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Harley Street Medical Centre, Abu Dhabi, UAE.ORCID 0000-0001-9188-9981
Federico FerrariDepartment of Gynaecologic Oncology, Churchill Hospital, Oxford University, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7065-2432
Churchill Hospital · GBAbu Dhabi University · AE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study investigates the specific morbidity of rectosigmoid resection (RSR) during Visceral-Peritoneal Debulking (VPD) in a consecutive series of patients with stage IIIC-IV ovarian cancer and compares the results of the colo-rectal vs. the gynaecologic oncology team.

methodsAll patients with the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IIIC-IV ovarian cancer who had VPD and RSR were included in the study. Between 2009 and 2013 all operations were performed by the gynecologic oncology team alone (group 1). Since 2013 the RSR was performed by the colorectal team together with the gynecologic oncologist (group 2). All pre-operative information and surgical details were compared to exclude significant bias. Intra- and post-operative morbidity events were recorded and compared between groups.

resultsOne hundred and sixty-two patients had a RSR during VPD, 93 in group 1 and 69 in group 2. Groups were comparable for all pre-operative features other than: albumin (1<2) hemoglobin (2<1) and up-front surgery (1>2). Overall morbidity was 33% vs. 40% (p=0.53), bowel specific morbidity 11.8% vs. 11.5% (p=0.81), anastomotic leak 4.1% vs. 6.1% (p=0.43) and re-operation rate 9.6% vs. 6.1% (p=0.71) in groups 1 and 2, respectively. None of them were significantly different. The rate of bowel diversion was 36.5% in group 1 vs. 46.3% in group 2 (p=0.26).

conclusionsOur study failed to demonstrate any significant difference in the morbidity rate of RSR based on the team performing the surgery. These data warrant further investigation as they are interesting with regards to education, finance, and medico-legal aspects.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsGenital Neoplasms, FemaleOvarian NeoplasmsCytoreduction Surgical ProceduresFemaleHumansMorbidityNeoplasm StagingMorbidityOvarian CancerSurgery

Identifiers

PMID33825357
PMCPMC8039168
OpenAlexW3148773723

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.