Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33825119›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract2021

Clinical Outcomes of Endoscopic Treatment for Type 1 Gastric Neuroendocrine Tumor.

Jin Hee Noh, Do Hoon Kim, Hwan Yoon, Li-Chang Hsing, Hee Kyong Na, Ji Yong Ahn, Jeong Hoon Lee, Kee Wook Jung, Kee Don Choi, Ho June Song and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Jin Hee NohDepartment of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Do Hoon KimDepartment of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. dohoon.md@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-4250-4683
Hwan YoonDepartment of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Li-Chang HsingDepartment of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Hee Kyong NaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Ji Yong AhnDepartment of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Jeong Hoon LeeDepartment of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Kee Wook JungDepartment of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Kee Don ChoiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Ho June SongDepartment of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Gin Hyug LeeDepartment of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Hwoon-Yong JungDepartment of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough the rate of early detection and endoscopic treatment of gastric neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) is steadily increasing, there are insufficient studies on the long-term outcomes of endoscopic treatment. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the clinical features and long-term outcomes of endoscopic treatment for type 1 gastric NETs.

methodsSubjects who underwent endoscopic treatment for gastric NETs between March 1997 and December 2015 were included. Clinical features and endoscopic treatment outcomes were retrospectively investigated by reviewing medical records.

resultsIn total, 125 subjects underwent endoscopic treatment including forceps biopsy (n = 21), argon plasma coagulation (n = 1), endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR, n = 62), and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD, n = 41). In total, 103 patients with 114 lesions, who underwent EMR or ESD, were analyzed to evaluate endoscopic and oncologic outcomes. The rates of en bloc resection in the EMR and ESD groups were 91.5% and 97.7%, respectively. Complete resection rates were significantly higher in the ESD group than in the EMR group; it was also higher in < 1-cm small-sized lesions than in 1-2-cm large-sized lesions. Adverse events were similar between the two groups. During a median follow-up period of 63 months, local recurrence rates were 6.5% and 2.4% in the EMR and ESD groups, respectively, and the disease-free survival rate did not differ significantly between the groups.

conclusionEndoscopic treatment for type 1 gastric NETs less than 2 cm in diameter and confined to mucosal and submucosal layers could be an effective and safe treatment strategy based on the favorable long-term outcome.

Indexed as

Endoscopic Mucosal ResectionNeuroendocrine TumorsStomach NeoplasmsHumansIntestinal MucosaNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeEndoscopic mucosal resectionEndoscopic submucosal dissectionNeuroendocrine tumorStomach

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.