Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33825094›Full record

ReviewPsychonomic bulletin & review2021

Statistical approaches to identifying lapses in psychometric response data.

Torin K Clark, Daniel M Merfeld

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Visuotactile integration in individuals with fibromyalgia.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Attention in Schizophrenia.Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Impact of Canal-Otolith Integration on Postural Control.Frontiers in integrative neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Torin K ClarkJenks Vestibular Physiology Laboratory, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, MA, 02114, USA. torin.clark@colorado.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9345-9712
Daniel M MerfeldOtolaryngology-Head&Neck Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, 43212, USA.

Funding

Vestibular thresholds, including psychophysical response dynamicsR01DC004158 · NIDCD · MASSACHUSETTS EYE AND EAR INFIRMARY · PI MERFELD, DANIEL M · 1999 to 2013
$4.9M
National Institute of Deafness and Other Communications Disorders R01DC04158National Space Biomedical Research Institute (NSBRI) NASA Grant NCC9-58
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Psychometric curve fits relate physical stimuli to an observer's performance. In experiments an observer may "lapse" and respond with a random guess, which may negatively impact (e.g., bias) the psychometric fit parameters. A lapse-rate model has been popularized by Wichmann and Hill, which reduces the impact of lapses on other estimated parameters by adding a parameter to model the lapse rate. Since lapses are discrete events, we developed a discrete lapse theory and tested a "lapse identification" algorithm to identify individual outlier trials (i.e., potential lapses) based upon an approximate statistical criterion and discard these trials. Specifically, we focused on stimuli sampled using an adaptive staircase for a one-interval, direction-recognition task (i.e., psychometric function ranging from 0 to 1 and the spread of the curve corresponds to the threshold, which is often a parameter of interest for many fitted psychometric functions). Through simulations, we found that as the lapse rate increased the threshold became substantially overestimated, consistent with earlier analyses. While the lapse-rate model reduced the overestimation of threshold with many lapses, with lower lapse rates it yielded substantial threshold underestimation, though less so when fitting many (e.g., 1,000) trials. In comparison, the lapse-identification algorithm yielded accurate threshold estimates across a wide range of lapse rates (from 0 to 5%), which is critical since the lapse rate is seldom known. We further demonstrate the performance of the lapse-identification algorithm to be suitable for a variety of experimental conditions and conclude with some considerations of its use. In particular, we suggest using the lapse-identification algorithm unless the experiment has many trials (e.g., >500) or if somehow the lapse rate is known to be high (e.g., ≥5%), for which the lapse-rate model approaches remain preferred.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsBiasHumansPsychometricsBayesian inference and parameter estimationJudgment and decision makingSignal detection theory

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.