Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33825083›Full record

ReviewPlant molecular biology2021

Quantitative cell biology of tip growth in moss.

Jeffrey P Bibeau, Giulia Galotto, Min Wu, Erkan Tüzel, Luis Vidali

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Plant molecular biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Molecular biology of mosses.Plant molecular biology · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jeffrey P Bibeau *Department of Biology and Biotechnology, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA, USA.
Giulia Galotto *Department of Biology and Biotechnology, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA, USA.
Min WuDepartment of Mathematical Sciences, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA, USA.
Erkan TüzelBioengineering Department, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Luis VidaliDepartment of Biology and Biotechnology, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA, USA. lvidali@wpi.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5835-4587
Worcester Polytechnic Institute · USTemple University · US

Funding

Composition, in vivo dynamics, and regulation of the exocyst in plant cellsR15GM134493 · NIGMS · WORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE · PI VIDALI, LUIS · 2019 to 2019
$448k
Directorate for Biological Sciences MCB-1253444NIGMS NIH HHS 1R15GM134493NIGMS NIH HHS R15 GM134493
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

key messageHere we review, from a quantitative point of view, the cell biology of protonemal tip growth in the model moss Physcomitrium patens. We focus on the role of the cytoskeleton, vesicle trafficking, and cell wall mechanics, including reviewing some of the existing mathematical models of tip growth. We provide a primer for existing cell biological tools that can be applied to the future study of tip growth in moss. Polarized cell growth is a ubiquitous process throughout the plant kingdom in which the cell elongates in a self-similar manner. This process is important for nutrient uptake by root hairs, fertilization by pollen, and gametophyte development by the protonemata of bryophytes and ferns. In this review, we will focus on the tip growth of moss cells, emphasizing the role of cytoskeletal organization, cytoplasmic zonation, vesicle trafficking, cell wall composition, and dynamics. We compare some of the existing knowledge on tip growth in protonemata against what is known in pollen tubes and root hairs, which are better-studied tip growing cells. To fully understand how plant cells grow requires that we deepen our knowledge in a variety of forms of plant cell growth. We focus this review on the model plant Physcomitrium patens, which uses tip growth as the dominant form of growth at its protonemal stage. Because mosses and vascular plants shared a common ancestor more than 450 million years ago, we anticipate that both similarities and differences between tip growing plant cells will provide mechanistic information of tip growth as well as of plant cell growth in general. Towards this mechanistic understanding, we will also review some of the existing mathematical models of plant tip growth and their applicability to investigate protonemal morphogenesis. We attempt to integrate the conclusions and data across cell biology and physical modeling to our current state of knowledge of polarized cell growth in P. patens and highlight future directions in the field.

Indexed as

Actin CytoskeletonAlgorithmsBryophytaMeristemModels, BiologicalMyosinsPlant CellsPlant ProteinsPlant RootsPollen TubeMyosinsPlant ProteinsF-ActinFRAPMathematical modelingMyosin XIPolarized growthPolarized secretionWall mechanics

Identifiers

PMID33825083
PMCPMC8492783
OpenAlexW3147449270

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.