Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33825075›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical systems2021

Experiences in Electronic Consultation (eConsult) Service in Gynecology from a Quaternary Academic Medical Center.

Chiara M Corbetta-Rastelli, Tamandra K Morgan, Nazaneen Homaifar, Lisa Deangelis, Amy M Autry

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical systems, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Telemedicine Lessons Learned During the COVID-19 Pandemic.Current allergy and asthma reports · 2022
    Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Chiara M Corbetta-RastelliDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences, University of California San Francisco, 480 16th Street, 10th Floor, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA. chiara.corbetta-rastelli@ucsf.edu.
Tamandra K MorganDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences, University of California San Francisco, 480 16th Street, 10th Floor, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA.
Nazaneen HomaifarDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences, University of California San Francisco, 480 16th Street, 10th Floor, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA.
Lisa DeangelisDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences, University of California San Francisco, 480 16th Street, 10th Floor, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA.
Amy M AutryDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences, University of California San Francisco, 480 16th Street, 10th Floor, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To evaluate an academic institution's implementation of a gynecologic electronic consultation (eConsult) service, including the most common queries, turnaround time, need for conversion to in-person visits, and to demonstrate how eConsults can improve access and convenience for patients and providers. This is a descriptive and retrospective electronic chart review. We obtained data from the UCSF eConsult and Smart Referral program manager. The medical system provided institution-wide statistics. Three authors reviewed and categorized gynecologic eConsults for the last fiscal year. The senior author resolved conflicts in coding. The eConsult program manager provided billing information and provider reimbursement. A total of 548 eConsults were submitted to the gynecology service between July 2017 and June 2020 (4.5% of institutional eConsult volume). Ninety-five percent of the eConsults were completed by a senior specialist within our department. Abnormal pap smear management, abnormal uterine bleeding, and contraception questions were the most common queries. Over half (59.3%) of all inquiries were answered on the same day as they were received, with an average of 9% declined. Gynecology was the 10th largest eConsult provider at our institution in 2020. The present investigation describes one large university-based experience with eConsults in gynecology. Results demonstrate that eConsults permit appropriate, efficient triaging of time-sensitive conditions affecting patients especially in the time of the COVID-19 pandemic. eConsult services provide the potential to improve access, interdisciplinary communication, and patient and provider satisfaction.

Indexed as

Academic Medical CentersContraceptionCOVID-19FemaleGynecologyHealth Services AccessibilityHumansInsurance, Health, ReimbursementPandemicsPapanicolaou TestReferral and ConsultationRemote ConsultationRetrospective StudiesSARS-CoV-2Time FactorsUterine HemorrhageClinical accessConsultationCOVID-19GynecologyPrimary careReimbursementSubspecialty servicesTelehealthTelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID33825075
PMCPMC8023771

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.