Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33825068›Full record

SynthesisEuropean journal of pediatrics2021

Effectiveness of probiotics and synbiotics in reducing duration of acute infectious diarrhea in pediatric patients in developed countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Loukia Vassilopoulou, Panagiota Spyromitrou-Xioufi, Fani Ladomenou

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European journal of pediatrics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Probiotics: truths and illusions.Iranian journal of microbiology · 2024
    Article
  8. Analysis of nutrients inBiochemistry and biophysics reports · 2023
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Loukia VassilopoulouSchool of Medicine, University of Crete, Heraklion, Greece.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5065-7121
Panagiota Spyromitrou-XioufiDepartment of Pediatrics, Venizeleion General Hospital of Heraklion, 71409, Heraklion, Crete, Greece.
Fani LadomenouDepartment of Pediatrics, Venizeleion General Hospital of Heraklion, 71409, Heraklion, Crete, Greece. fladomenou@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1090-3698

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acute diarrhea is one of the most frequent causes of doctor visits and hospital admissions for children. Our objective was to evaluate the association between probiotics administration and reduction of acute infectious diarrhea duration in children dwelling in developed countries. Bibliographic databases, gray literature, and reference lists were searched up to September 29, 2019. Double-blind, randomized controlled trials that examined probiotics efficacy in children with acute infectious diarrhea residing in developed countries were included. Data were synthesized by generic inverse variance method using fixed- and random-effects model. Twenty trials met the eligibility criteria (n = 3469 patients) and were included in the qualitative synthesis, and 19 studies in meta-analysis. Twelve trials (n = 840) were assessed as high/unclear risk of bias and eight (n = 2629) as low risk of bias. Comparisons revealed a moderate effectiveness of probiotics in low risk of bias studies (MD = - 13.45 h; 95% CI - 24.26, - 2.62; p = 0.02, Bayesian meta-analysis pooled effect MD = - 0.38, 95% CrI - 2.3, 1.58) and a notable effect in studies with high/unclear risk for bias (MD = - 19.70 h; 95% CI - 28.09, - 11.31; p = 0.0004). In trials of optimal methodological quality (n = 1989), probiotics effect was absent (MD = - 3.32 h; 95% CI - 8.78, 2.13, p = 0.23).Conclusion: Outcomes suggest that probiotics do not demonstrate sufficient clinical impact in reducing diarrhea duration in children in the developed countries.Systematic Review Registration: This review is registered at PROSPERO (ID: CRD42020152966). What is Known: • Probiotics, due to the conflicting study results, are administered without adequate evidence as an adjuvant therapeutic agent for eliminating duration of acute infectious diarrhea in pediatric patients. What is New: • In developed countries, probiotics are demonstrated as ineffective in reducing the duration of acute infectious diarrhea in children.

Indexed as

ProbioticsSynbioticsBayes TheoremChildDeveloped CountriesDiarrheaHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicChildrenGastroenteritisMeta-analysisProbioticsRandomized controlled trials

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.