ArticleDer Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft2022
[Online examination course instead of classroom teaching: adaptation of medical student teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic].
Article in Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Adaptations in clinical examinations of medical students in response to the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review.BMC medical education · 2022Pooled it
- Misjudgment of Skills in Clinical Examination Increases in Medical Students Due to a Shift to Exclusively Online Studies during the COVID-19 Pandemic.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic restricted face-to-face interactions of medical students and teachers.
objectiveTo develop and evaluate an online course for ophthalmology examination techniques for medical students and to determine the impact of the course on the practical objective structured clinical examination (OSCE). MATERIAL AND
methodsThe online examination course was developed as a video-based tutorial according to the SMART (specific, measurable, activating, reasonable, time-bound) principle covering all topics of the National Competency-based Catalogue of Learning Objectives for Medical Education and made available to medical students in the ophthalmology course. At the end of the semester the students graded the online examination course on an ordinal scale from 1 (strongly agree) to 6 (strongly disagree) anonymously and were asked for comments. The grades of the OSCE (range 1-5) were compared with the OSCE results of the previous semester.
resultsOf the 164 students 67 participated in the online evaluation (41%). The students reported to be well-prepared for the OSCE (mean grade 2.0; SD 1.0). In the future, 70% of the students would prefer combined online and on-site teaching (47 out of 67 students). Among all 164 students, the mean OSCE results were excellent (mean grade 1.1; SD 0.2) and comparable to the previous semester (mean grade among 166 students, 1.1; SD 0.2; two-sided t-test, p = 0.86).
conclusionThe online course on ophthalmology examination techniques allowed medical students to prepare for the OSCE. Beyond the COVID-19 pandemic, online teaching options can support on-site teaching.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.