Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33825049›Full record

Trial reportWorld journal of surgery2021

Validation of the Appendicitis Inflammatory Response (AIR) Score.

Manne Andersson, Blanka Kolodziej, Roland E Andersson

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in World journal of surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00971438 (Structured Management of Patients With Suspicion of Appendicitis Using a Clinical Score and Selective Imaging), which is not on this map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
8.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00971438 naterminatednot on this map

Structured Management of Patients With Suspicion of Appendicitis Using a Clinical Score and Selective Imaging

TypeinterventionalSponsorRyhov County HospitalRan2009 to 2012Enrolled1,312ConditionsAppendicitisArmsDiagnostic imaging
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Appendicitis.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Manne AnderssonDepartment of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Blanka KolodziejDepartment of Pathology, County Hospital Ryhov, County Council of Jönköping, Jönköping, Sweden.
Roland E AnderssonDepartment of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden. roland.andersson@rjl.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1460-0248
Linköping University · SERegion Jönköpings län · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with suspicion of appendicitis present with a wide range of severity. Score-based risk stratification can optimise the management of these patients. This prospective study validates the Appendicitis Inflammatory Response (AIR) score in patients with suspicion of appendicitis.

methodConsecutive patients over the age of five with suspicion of appendicitis presenting at 25 Swedish hospital's emergency departments were prospectively included. The diagnostic properties of the AIR score are estimated.

resultsSome 3878 patients were included, 821 with uncomplicated and 724 with complicated appendicitis, 1986 with non-specific abdominal pain and 347 with other diagnoses. The score performed better in detecting complicated appendicitis (ROC area 0.89 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.88-0.90) versus 0.83 (CI 0.82-0.84) for any appendicitis, p < 0.001), in patients below age 15 years and in patients with >47 h duration of symptoms (ROC area 0.93, CI 0.90-0.95 for complicated and 0.87, CI 0.84-0.90 for any appendicitis in both categories). Complicated appendicitis is unlikely at AIR score <4 points (Negative Predictive Value 99%, CI 98-100%). Appendicitis is likely at AIR score >8 points, especially in young patients (positive predictive value (PPV) 96%, CI 90-100%) and men (PPV 89%, CI 84-93%).

conclusionsThe AIR score has high sensitivity for complicated appendicitis and identifies subgroups with low probability of complicated appendicitis or high probability of appendicitis. The discriminating capacity is high in children and patients with long duration of symptoms. It performs equally well in both sexes. This verifies the AIR score as a valid decision support. Trial registration number https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00971438.

Indexed as

AppendicitisAdolescentChildEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHumansMalePredictive Value of TestsProspective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificitySweden

Identifiers

PMID33825049
PMCPMC8154764
OpenAlexW3139928290

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.